CLAUSE 8 OF BILL S-4:
AMENDING THE INTERPRETATION ACT

Endnotes

  • [1] R. Sullivan, Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1994) at 235.

  • [2] (U.K.) 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3.

  • [3] (U.K.) 14 George III, c. 83/R.S.C. 1985 (Appendices) No. 2.

  • [4] Ibid. s.11.

  • [5] (U.K.) 31 Geo. III, c. 31/R.S.C. 1985 (Appendices) No. 3.

  • [6] Ibid. s. 2.

  • [7] Ibid. s. 33.

  • [8] Statutes of Upper Canada 1792, 32 Geo. III, c. 1, s. 1.

  • [9] Statutes of Upper Canada 1800, 40 Geo. III, c. 1, s. 1.

  • [10] (U.K.) 3-4 Victoria, c. 35/R.S.C. 1985 (Appendices) No. 4.

  • [11]  E.g. the Heir and Devisee Commission established by 37 Geo.III (1797), c. 3 (U.C.).

  • [12] Constitution Act 1867, subs. 92(13).

  • [13] P.W. Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada, loose-leaf ed., par. 21.2.

  • [14] Ibid.

  • [15] Ibid. s. 21.2.

  • [16] Canada National Parks Act, S.C. 2000, c. 32, subs. 2(1).

  • [17] R.S.C. 1985, c. L-2, as am. by S.C. 1998, c. 26.

  • [18] R.S.C. 1985,  c. C-50.

  • [19] Ibid., par. 3(a).

  • [20] Ibid., par. 3(b).

  • [21] Heading of chapter III of Title One in Book Five.

  • [22] Loi sur l'application de la réforme du Code civil, S.Q. 1992, c. 57, especially s. 85

  • [23]See Côté, The Interpretation of Legislation in Canada, 3rd ed. (Scarborough: Carswell, 2000) at 323-328; Sullivan, supra at 215-231.

  • [24] A First Act to harmonize federal law with the civil law of the Province of Quebec and to amend certain Acts in order to ensure that each language version takes into account the common law and the civil law, 1st Sess., 37th Parl., 2001.

  • [25] S.C. 1967-68, c. 7.

  • [26] Standing Committee (House of Commons) on Justice and Legal Affairs, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence (1966-1967) at 1003-1004.

  • [27] Interpretation Act, s. 8.

  • [28] Ibid. subs. 4(1).

  • [29] Ibid. subs. 4(2).

  • [30] Ibid. s. 5.

  • [31] Ibid. s. 22.

  • [32] Ibid. s. 25.

  • [33] Ibid. subs. 8(1).

  • [34] Ibid. s. 17.

  • [35] Ibid. s. 18.

  • [36] Ibid. s. 46.

  • [37] Emphasis added.

  • [38] Carltona Ltd. v. Commissioners of Works, [ 1943 ] 2 All E.R. 560 (C.A.).

  • [39] See e.g. Interpretation Act, s. 21, subss. 24(4) and 31(4).

  • [40] See e.g. Interpretation Act, ss. 7, 19 and subs. 23(4).

  • [41] See e.g. Sullivan, supra at 36; Côté, supra at 376-381.

  • [42] (1584), 76 E.R. 637 at 638.

  • [43] [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27 at 40, 41.

  • [44] Sullivan, supra at 40, 41.

  • [45] Ibid. at 40.

  • [46] S.C. 1999, c. 33 [ hereinafter CEPA ].

  • [47] CEPA, subs. 2(1).

  • [48] S.C. 2000, c. 6.

  • [49] S.C. 2000, c. 7.

  • [50] R.S.C. 1985, c. H-6.

  • [51] S.C. 1960, c. 44.

  • [52] Molot and Jewett, The State Immunity Act of Canada (1982), 2 C.Y.I.L. 79 at 81, 82.

  • [53] R.S.C. 1985, c. R-6.

  • [54] Bill S-4, supra cl. 8.

  • [55] Re Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd., supra at 41 [ emphasis added ].

  • [56] R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.).

  • [57] S.C. 1991, c. 50.

  • [58] Trust and Loan Companies Act, S.C. 1991, c. 45, subs. 419(2).

Date modified: