Victims' Experiences with, Expectations and Perceptions of Restorative Justice: A critical Review of the Literature

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents

6. Literature List

• Aertsen, I., & Peters, T. (1998). Mediation for reparation: The victim’s perspective. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 6(2), 106-124.
• Baurmann M., & Schadler, W. (1991). Victims of reported crime - their expectations, needs and perspectives. An inquiry of crime victims concerning victim protection, victim support and mediation. In G. Kaiser, H. Kury, & H.-J Albrecht (Eds.), Victims and Criminal Justice. Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Penal Law, 52(1), 3-27.
• Bazemore, G. (1999). Crime victims, restorative justice and the juvenile court: Exploring victim needs and involvement in the response to youth crime. International Review of Victimology, 6, 295-320.
• Beckers, M. (2000). La justice réparatrice et le système correctionnel canadien : Les points de vue des acteurs. Mémoire de maîtrise. Université de Montréal.
• Besserer, S., & Trainor, C. (2000). Criminal victimization in Canada. Statistics Canada, 20(10).
• Bethel, C., & Singer, L. (1982). Mediation: A new remedy for cases of domestic violence. Vermont Law Review, 6(2), 15-32.
• Bonta, J., Boyle, J., Motiuk, L., & Sonnichsen, P. (1983). Restitution in correctional half-way houses: Victim satisfaction, attitudes, and recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25(1), 277-293.
• Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta. S., & Rooney, J. (1998). Restorative justice: An evaluation of the restorative resolutions project.
• Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada, 1998-05.
• Chatterjee, J. (1999). Rapport sur l’évaluation de l’initiative de justice réparatrice de la GRC : Degré de satisfaction des participants aux forums de justice communautaire.
• Gendarmerie royale du Canada.
• Coates, R.B., & Gehm, J. (1989). An Empirical Assessment. In M. Wright & B. Galaway (Eds.). Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community. London : Sage Publications, 251-263.
• Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Department of Justice Canada. (2000). Families, children and youth.
• Dignan, J. (1992). Repairing the damage. British Journal of Criminology, 32(4), 453-473.
• DPJS. (2000). Tussenevaluatie hestel bemiddeling (Interim Evaluation of Restorative Mediation). Ministry of Justice, The Netherlands. [Summary available online at: www.minjust.nl]
• Federal-Provincial-Territorial Working Group on Victims of Crime. (1988). Statement of basic principles of justice for victims of crime. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
• Flaten, C. (1996). Victim-offender mediation: Application with serious offenses committed by juveniles. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives (pp. 387-401). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Gehm, J. (1990). Mediated victim-offender restitution agreements: An exploratory analysis of factors related to victim participation. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal Justice, Restitution and Reconciliation (pp.177-182). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Government of Canada (1988). Response to the Fourteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights - A Voice not a Veto.
• Griffiths, C. (1999). The victims of crime and restorative justice: The Canadian experience. International Review of Victimology, 6, 279-294.
• Gustafson, D. (1997). Victim offender mediation within a restorative justice framework: Toward a justice which heals. Address to the Prison Governors, Leuven, Belgium.
• Hoegen, M., & Brienen, E. (2000). Victims of crime in 22 European criminal justice systems. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Productions.
• Immarigeon, R. (1999). Restorative justice, juvenile offenders and crime victims: A review of literature. In G. Bazemore, & L. Walgrave (Eds.), Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 305-325). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Junger, M., & van Hecke, T. (1988). Schadevergoeding binnen het strafrecht. Den Haag, SDU Uitgeverij. Onderzoek en beleid no. 82.
• Kilchling, M. (1995). Offerinteressen und Strafverfolgung. Max-Plaank-Institut fur Auslandisches und Internationales Strafrecht.
• Kilchling, M. (1991). Interests of the victim and public prosecution. In G. Kaiser, H. Kury, & H-J. Albrecht (Eds.), Victims and criminal justice. Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Penal Law, 52(1), 30-65.
• LaPrairie, C. (1995). Altering course: New directions in criminal justice sentencing circles and family group conferences. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28, 78-99.
• Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2001). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Ottawa: Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice Canada.
• Launey, G. (1987). Victim-offender conciliation. In B. McGurk, D. Thorton, & M. Williams (Eds.), Applying psychology to imprisonment: Theory and practice (pp. 274-300). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
• Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, N.Y.: Plenum Press.
• Loschnig-Gspandl, M., & Kilchling, M. (1997). Victim/Offender mediation and victim compensation in Austria and Germany ­stocktaking and perspectives for future research. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1, 58-78.
• Maguire, M. (1991). The needs and rights of victims. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (pp. 363­387). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Maguire, M., & Corbett, C. (1987). The effects of crime and the work of victims support schemes. Aldershot, Eng.: Aldershot, Gower Publishing Company.
• Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
• Marshall, T., & Merry, S. (1990). Crime and accountability: Victim/Offender mediation in practice. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
• Mayhew. P., & Van Dijk, J. (1997). Criminal victimization in eleven industrialized countries. The Hague: Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice.
• Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Robertson J. (1993). Giving victims a voice: A New Zealand experiment. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 301-321.
• Mulder, R.P. (1989). Wie hept het slachtoffer? Publieke en particuliere voorzienning voor slachtoffers van misdrijven.
• Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Cahier, no. 70.
• Netzig, L., & Trenczek, T. (1996). Restorative justice as participation: Theory, law, experience and research. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 241- 260). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Reeves, H. (2000). Lecture given at the XVII Postgraduate Course on Victimology. Organized by the World Society of Victimology. Université de Montréal, August.
• Reeves, H. (1989). The victim support perspective. In M. Wright, & B. Galaway (Eds.), Mediation and criminal justice: Victims, offenders and community (pp. 44-55). London: Sage Publications.
• Resick, P. (1987). Psychological effects of victimization: Implications for the criminal justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 33(4), 468-478.
• Roach K. (1999). Due process and victims rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Roberts, T. (1995). Evaluation of the victim-offender mediation project, Langley, B.C. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.
• Rowe, E. (1985). The limits of the neighborhood justice : Why domestic violence should not be mediated. Emory Law Journal, 24, 855-997.
• Sessar, K. (1990). Tertiary victimization: A case of the politically abused crime victims. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution and reconciliation (pp. 37-45). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Shapland, J., Wilmore, J., & Duff, P. (1985). Victims in the criminal justice system. Aldershot, Eng.: Gower Publishing Company.
• Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N., & Teh, M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report on the Canberra reintegrative shaming experiments (RISE). Australian National University. [Available online at: www.aic.gov.au/rjustice/rise/progress/1998.html]
• Smith, B. (1988). Victims who know their assailants: Their satisfaction with the criminal court’s response. In G. Hoteling et al., (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 183-192). California: Sage Publications.
• Smith, B. (1983). Non-stranger violence - the criminal court’s response. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
• Smith, D., Blagg, H, & Derricourt, N. (1988). Mediation in the shadow of the law: The South Shore experience. In R. Matthews, Informal Justice? (pp. 123-150). London: Sage Publications.
• Strang, H. (2000). Victims and restorative justice: The Canberra reintegrative shaming experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University.
• Stuart, B. (1996). Circle sentencing: Turning swords into ploughshares. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 193-201). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Sullivan, S. (1998). Équilibrer la balance : L’état des droits des victimes au Canada. Ottawa : Centre canadien de ressources pour les victimes de crime.
• Tufts, J. (2000). Public attitudes toward the criminal justice system. Statistics Canada, 20(12).
• Tyler, T. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Umbreit, M. (1998). Restorative justice through victim-offender mediation: A multi-site assessment. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). [available online at http: //wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/umbreit.html]
• Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim Meets Offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
• Umbreit, M. (1995). Mediation of criminal conflict: An assessment of programs in four Canadian provinces. [available online at: http://ssw.che.umn.edu/rjp]
• Umbreit, M. (1990). Victim-offender mediation with violent offenders: Implications for modifications of the VORP model. In C. Viano (Ed.), The victimology handbook: Research findings, treatment, and public policy (pp. 337-351). New York: Garland Publishing.
• Umbreit, M. (1989). Violent offenders and their victims. In M. Wright, & B. Galaway (Eds.), Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community (pp. 99-112). London: Sage Publications.
• Umbreit, M., & Bradshaw, W. (1997). Victim experience of mediating adult v.s. juvenile offenders: A cross-national comparison. Federal Probation Journal, December, 33-39.
• Umbreit M., Bradshaw, W., & Coates, R. (1999). Victims of severe violence meet the offender: Restorative justice through dialogue. International Review of Victimology, 6, 321-343.
• Umbreit, M., & Roberts, A. (1996). Mediation of criminal conflict in England: An assessment of services in Coventry and Leeds. [available online at: http://ssw.che.umn.edu/rjp]
• Van Dijk, J., & Mayhew, P. (1992). Criminal victimization in the industrialized world: Key findings of the 1989 and 1992 international crime surveys. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.
• Van Hecke T., & Wemmers, J-A. (1992). Schadebemiddelingsproject Middelburg. WODC, Onderzoek en Beleid, 116, Gouda Quint b.v.
• Wemmers, J-A. (2000). Restorative justice: The choice between bilateral decision-making power and third party intervention.
• Paper presented at the Xth International Symposium on Victimology. Montreal, August.
• Wemmers, J-A. (1997). Review of the First International Symposium on Restorative Justice for Juveniles. The Victimologist, 1(1), 5.
• Wemmers, J-A. (1996). Restitution and conflict resolution in the Netherlands. In B. Galaway, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspec-tives (pp. 431-444). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
• Wemmers, J-A. (1996). Victims in the criminal justice system. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications.
• Wemmers, J., & Van Hecke, T. (1992). Strafrechtelijke dading (victim-offender mediation). Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Justitie, K23.

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents