Bala, N. (1999). Legal Responses to domestic violence in Canada and the role of health care professionals. Syrtash Collection of Family Law Articles (SFLRP/2000–004). Online QL, accessed 12/29/01.
Bibas, S. (2001). Judicial fact–finding and sentence enhancements in a world of guilty pleas. Yale Law Journal, 110, 1097 – 1185.
Brodeur, J.–P. (1999). Sentencing reform: Ten years after the Canadian Sentencing Commission. In: J.V. Roberts & D.P. Cole (Eds.), Making sense of sentencing. (pp. 332 – 348). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Canadian Sentencing Commission. (1987). Sentencing reform: A Canadian approach. Ontario: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
Chartrand, L. (1995). The appropriateness of the lawyer as advocate in contemporary aboriginal justice initiatives. Alberta Law Review, 33, 874 – 881.
Cohen, S. & Doob, A. (1990). Public attitudes to plea bargaining. Criminal Law Quarterly, 32, 85 – 109.
Colquitt, J. (2001). Ad hoc plea bargaining. Tulane Law Review, 75, 695–776.
Cousineau, D. & Verdun–Jones, S. (1979). Cleansing the augean stables: A critical analysis of recent trends in the plea bargaining debate in Canada. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 17, 227 – 260.
Davis, R. & Smith, B. (1994). Effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decision: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11, 453 – 469.
Department of Justice Canada (1998). Response to the Fourteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights: Victims' rights – A voice not a veto. Ottawa: Department of Justice. Retrieved March 30, 2002, from: /eng/news-nouv/nr/1998/victimsrep.html.
Department of Justice Canada (1999). Canadian Statement of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime. Ottawa: Department of Justice. Retrieved March 30, 2002 from:/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/victim/csbp.html
Dick, J. (1997). Allowing sentence bargains to fall outside of the Guidelines without valid departures. Hastings Law Journal, 48, 1017 – 1057.
Donahoe, J. (1999). The changing role of victim impact evidence in capital cases. Western Criminology Review, 2(1), Article 2. Retrieved April 1, April 2002, from: http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v2n1/donahoe.html
Dunworth, T. & Weisselberg, C.D. (1992). Felony cases and the federal courts: The Guidelines experience. Southern California Law Review, 66, 99 – 153.
Edwards, I. (2001). Victim participation in sentencing: The problems of incoherence. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 39 – 54.
Erez, E. (1990). Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 19 – 31.
Erez, E. & Roeger, L. (1995). Effect of victim impact statements on sentencing patterns and outcomes: The Australian experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 363 – 375.
Erez, E. & Rogers, L. (1999). Victim impact statements and sentencing outcomes and processes. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 216–239.
European Union (2001). Council framework decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings. The Council of the European Union, Document 301F0220. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://europa.eu.int/eur–lex/en/lif/dat/2001/en_301F0220.html
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (2000). U.S. Code, Title 18, as amended to December 1st, 2000. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http:/www.law.ukans.edu/research/frcrimIV.htm
Fenwick, H. (1997). Procedural rights' of victims of crime: Public or private ordering of the criminal justice process? Modern Law Review, 60, 317 – 333.
Finn–deLuca, V. (1994). Victim participation at sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin, 30, 403 – 428.
Galligan, P.T. (1996). Report to the Attorney General of Ontario on Certain Matters Relating to Karla Homolka. Toronto: ADR Chambers.
Giliberti, C. (1990). Study probes the effectiveness of victim impact statements. Justice Research Notes, 1, 1 – 8.
Hall, D. (1991). Victims' voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 223 – 266.
Heaney–Gerald, W. (1991). The reality of guidelines sentencing: no end to disparity. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 161 – 232.
Herman, N. (1997). Plea bargaining. Virginia, Lexis Law Publishing.
Home Office. (1997). Victims Charter. London: Home Office. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/cpd/pvu/viccomp.htm
Home Office. (2000). HM Inspectorate of Probation, Thematic Inspection Report. The victim perspective: Ensuring the victim matters. London: Home Office.
Home Office. (2001). A review of the Victim's Charter. London: Home Office Communication Directorate.
Home Office. (No Date). Making a victim personal statement. London: Home Office. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/cpd/pvu/victimstate.pdf
Hutchison, S. (1997). Issues in criminal evidence: Procedure and the Charter; An update on 1996–97 developments. Alan D. Gold Collection of Criminal Law Articles (ADGN/RP–026). Online, QL. Accessed on 12/29/01.
Karle, T. W. & Sager, T. (1991). Are the Federal Sentencing Guidelines meeting Congressional goals?: An empirical and case law analysis. Emory Law Journal, 40, 393 – 444.
Kennard, K. (1989). The victim's veto: A way to increase victim impact on criminal case dispositions. California Law Review, 77, 417 – 453.
Kilpatrick, D., Beatty, D. & Smith, S. (1998). The rights of crime victims – Does legal protection make a difference? Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
Klein, A. (1997). Sentencing Criminals: Alternative sentencing, intermediate sanctions and probation. Ohio: Anderson Publishing Company.
Law Reform Commission of Canada. (1975). Working paper no. 15: Criminal procedure: Control of the process. Ottawa: Information Canada.
Law Reform Commission of Canada. (1989). Working paper no. 60: Plea discussions and agreements. Ottawa: Law Reform Commission of Canada.
Lynett, E. & Rogers, R. (2000). Emotions overriding forensic opinions? The potentially biasing effects of victim statements. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 449 – 457.
Mackenzie, G. (1996). Breaking the dichotomy habit: The adversary system and the ethics of professionalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 9, 33–50.
McDonald, W. (1987). Judicial supervision of the guilty plea process. Judicature, 70, 203–215.
McGillivray, A. (1997–98). R. v. Bauder: Seductive Children, Safe Rapists, and Other Justice Tales. Manitoba Law Journal, 25, 359 – 383.
Manson, A. (2001). The Law of Sentencing. Toronto: Irwin Law.
Manson, A. (2001). Motivation, the Supreme Court and mandatory sentencing for murder. Criminal Reports (5th Series), 39, 65 – 71.
Miller, J.G. (1996). Search and destroy: African–American males in the criminal justice system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, G. (2001). "No joy in this for anyone": Reflections on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in R. v. Latimer. Saskatchewan Law Review, 64, 491 – 510.
Murphy, J. (2000). Two cheers for vindictiveness. Punishment and Society, 2, 131 – 143.
National Center for Victims of Crime. (2002). Victim impact statement models – improving communications between the justice system and our nation's crime victims. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Victims of crime. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.ncvc.org/vroom/impact_model.htm
Pan, J. & Kaiser, M. (2001). Thirtieth annual review of criminal procedure: Guilty pleas. Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 1384 – 1437.
Ontario, Attorney General. (1993). Report of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee on Charge Screening, Disclosure and Resolutions Discussions. Toronto: Queen's Printer.
Parent, D., Dunworth, T., McDonald, D. & Rhodes, W. (1996). Key Legislative Issues in Criminal Justice: The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
Platt & Kauffman (2000). The victim's rights amendment: A prosecutor's and, surprisingly, a defence attorney's support in sentencing. Maryland Law Review, 59, 628 – 641.
Rapping, E. (2000). Television, melodrama, and the rise of the victims' rights movement. New York Law School Law Review, 43, 665 – 690.
Renke, W.N. (1996). Flappers to rappers: Criminal law in 1921 and 1996. Alberta Law Review, 35, 80 – 115.
Roach, K. (1999). Due process and victim's rights: The new law and politics of criminal justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr. Prosecution (N.S.). (1989). Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr. Prosecution: Commissioner's Report: Findings and Recommendations, Vol 1. Halifax: Royal Commission.
Sanders, A., Hoyle, C., Morgan, R. & Cape, E. (2001). Victim impact statements: Don't work, can't work. Criminal Law Review, 2001, 447 – 458.
Schmalleger, F., MacAlister, D., Mckenna, P.F., & Winterdyk, J. (2000). Canadian criminal justice today: An introductory text for the twenty–first century. Toronto: Prentice–Hall Canada Inc.
Seifman, R. & Freidberg, A. (2001). Plea bargaining in Victoria: The role of counsel. Criminal Law Journal, 25, 64 – 74.
Sigman, S. (1999). An analysis of Rule 11 plea bargain options. University of Chicago Law Review, 66, 1317 – 1340.
Smith, B., Watkins, E. & Morgan, K. (1997). The effects of victim participation on parole decisions: Results from a southeastern state. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8, 57–74.
Sobieski, R. (1993). MADD study finds most victims satisfied with law enforcement. MADDVOCATE, Winter edition 1993.
Solicitor General, Canada (2001). Victims to speak at National Parole Board Hearings. Ottawa: Solicitor General, Canada. News Release, May 9, 2001. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: www.sgc.gc.ca/releases/e20010509.htm
Solicitor General, Canada. (1998). CCRA 5 Year Review: Provision Relating to Victims. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/corr/eccra/evictims/evictims.htm
Starkweather, D. (1992). The retributive theory of "just deserts" and victim participation in plea bargaining. Indiana Law Journal, 67, 853 – 878.
Stevens, M. (2000). Victim impact statements considered in sentencing: constitutional concerns. California Criminal Law Review, 2, Article 3. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from http://www.boalt.org/CCLR/v2/v2toc.html.
Sullivan, S. (1998). Balancing the scales. Ottawa: Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime, pp. 1–79. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www/crcvc.ca/Publications/balancing_the_scales.htm
Taha, A. (2001). The equilibrium effect of legal rule changes: Are the federal sentencing guidelines being circumvented? International Review of Law and Economics, 21, 251–269.
Tobolowski, P. (1999). Victim participation in the criminal justice process. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25, 21–105.
United Nations. (1985). Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. GA/Res/40/34. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp49.htm
United Nations. (1998). Handbook for Victims: On the use and application of the United Nations Declarationof Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.victimology.nl/onlpub/hb/hbook.html
U.S. Code (2000). Title 18 – Crimes and criminal procedure. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/
U.S. Department of Justice. (2000). Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance. Office for Victims of Crime: Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). The Crime Victim's Right to be Present. Washington, D.C.: Office for Victims of Crime.
U.S. Department of Justice, (1998, Report no. 4). New Directions from the field: Victims' rights and services for the 21st century. Office for Victims of Crime: Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Justice, (1998, Report no. 5). New Directions from the field: Victims' rights and services for the 21st century. Office for Victims of Crime: Washington, D.C.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2001). Federal Sentencing Statistics, 1999 Fiscal Year. Retrieved April 1, 2002, from: http://www.ussc.gov/judpack/1999.
Verdun–Jones & Hatch, (1988). Plea bargaining and sentencing guidelines. Ontario: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
Verdun–Jones, S.N., & Hatch, A.J. (1987). An overview of plea bargaining in Canada: Cautionary notes for sentencing reform. In: H. Dumont (Ed.), Sentencing: La determination de la peine. (pp.71 – 106) . Cowansville, QuZbec: Les Ėditions Yvon Blais Inc.
Wemmers, J.A. (1999). Victim notification and public support for the criminal justice system. International Review of Victimology, 6, 167 – 178.
Welling, S. (1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington University Law Quarterly, 65, 301 – 356.
Young, A. (2001). The role of the victims in the criminal process: A literature review – 1989 to 1999. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.