Table of contents

• Previous Page
• Next Page

• Executive summary
• 1. Introduction
  • 1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation
  • 1.2 Evaluation Scope
• 2. Program profile
  • 2.1 Program Description
  • 2.2 Resources
• 3. Evaluation methodology
  • 3.1 Document and Data Review
  • 3.2 Key Informant Interviews
  • 3.3 Courtworkers and Judicial/Court Officials Surveys
  • 3.4 Client Survey
  • 3.5 Case Studies
  • 3.6 Evaluation Limitations
• 4. Findings
  • 4.1 Relevance
  • 4.2 Effectiveness
  • 4.3 Program Design and Delivery
  • 4.4 Efficiency
• 5. Conclusions and recommendations
  • 5.1 Conclusions
  • 5.2 Recommendations
• Appendix A: Evaluation issues and questions
• Appendix B: Evaluation methodology

List of Figures

• Figure 1: Percentage of Adult Custody Admissions to Correctional Services Versus Percentage of Population of Canada by Indigenous Identity, 2020-21
• Figure 2: Types of Culturally Relevant Information, Services and Programming Provided by Courtworkers in Criminal Court
• Figure 3: Culturally Relevant Information, Services and Programming Provided by Courtworkers in Family Court
• Figure 4: Satisfaction of Indigenous Courtwork Program Clients with the Information Provided by Courtworkers
• Figure 5: Information and Advice Provided by Courtworkers to Judicial and Court Officials
• Figure 6: Satisfaction with Information Provided by Courtworkers to Judicial and Court Officials
• Figure 7: Impact on the Use of Non-Custodial Options and Rehabilitative Programming
• Figure 8: Courtworker Partnerships Developed or Strengthened
• Figure 9: Level of Client Satisfaction with Information Provided by Courtworkers

List of Tables

• Table 1: ICW Stakeholder Groups
• Table 2: Financial Resources Allocated to the Program from 2018-19 to 2021-22 (in millions)
• Table 3: Estimated Annual Average Number of Clients Served by the ICW Program by GBA+ Group, FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19
• Table 4: Annual Perceived Cost Savings to the Justice System by the ICW Program
• Table 5: Key Informant Respondents by Jurisdiction and Type
• Table 6: Description of Survey Respondents
• Table 7: Survey Respondents by Jurisdiction and Type
• Table 8: Survey Response Rate
• Table 9: Client Survey Respondents by Jurisdiction
• Table 10: Description of Case Studies

• Previous Page
• Next Page