Consultations on Physician-Assisted Dying - Summary of Results and Key Findings

Annex I - Media Analysis Sep. 2014 - Nov. 2015

Table of Contents

Executive summary

Methodology

Objective

This report offers an examination of media coverage of assisted dying between September 2014 and November 2015, inclusive.

Content

Articles pertaining to assisted dying were collected from online and print media sources using MediaMiser's news monitoring modules.

General coverage

Tone

A sample of articles was manually toned for opinions presented on assisted dying, as well as opinions on the external panel and consultation process.

The following rating scale was used:

Added point: Article is supportive of or in favour of assisted dying, the consultation process, or panel members.

Loss of Point: Article is critical of or against assisted dying, the consultation process, or panel members.

Neutral: Article is purely factual, with no opinion presented.

Coverage trend
Figure1 - title
Figure 1 - Text equivalent

*A graph depicting media coverage trends for articles on assisted dying. The graph charts the number of articles and the amount of circulation, by month, between September 2014 and November 2015. A spike in articles and circulation is noted in February 2015 when the Supreme Court strikes down the ban on assisted death. Another notation occurs in August 2015 when the external panel on assisted dying maintains that its members were chosen to be objective.

Number of articles and circulation figures by month are:

Date # Articles Circulation
Sep. 14 183 13,901,106
Oct. 14 685 49,272,217
Nov. 14 248 15,854,301
Dec. 14 276 22,308,416
Jan. 15 285 27,547,924
Feb. 15 3,238 209,905,409
Mar. 15 372 33,729,850
Apr. 15   79 9,269,471
May 15   53 6,308,950
Jun. 15 154 14,982,888
Jul. 15 460 29,954,964
Aug. 15 576 46,462,814
Sep. 15 400 42,787,318
Oct. 15 948 72,783,187
Nov. 15 982 59,167,903
Publication types
Figure2 - title
Figure 2 - Text equivalent

*A pie chart that divides the overall percentages of media articles on assisted dying into 3 different publication types. 77% of articles were from News Websites, 22% were Print articles, and 1% were from Blogs.

Top outlets
Figure3 - title
Figure 3 - Text equivalent

*A bar graph listing the total number of media articles on assisted dying by top Canadian news outlets. It lists 10 news outlets and shows the number of articles released by each outlet.

The number of articles released by each top news outlet were:

Outlet Articles
National Post 201
CBC News (Online) 196
Toronto Star (Online) 131
LifeSite (Online) 127
Global News (Online) 104
Ottawa Citizen (Online) 104
CTV News (Online) 102
National Post (Online) 100
Ottawa Citizen 99
Saskatoon StarPhoenix 97
Top journalists
Figure4 - title
Graph - Text equivalent

*A bar graph listing the total number of media articles on assisted dying by top journalists. It lists 10 journalists, their respective Canadian news outlet, and shows the number of articles released by each journalist.

The number of articles released by each top journalist were:

Journalist Articles
Sharon Kirkey - Postmedia News 336
Michael Den Tandt - Ottawa Citizen 77
Andrew Coyne - National Post 75
Sheryl Ubelacker - The Canadian Press 58
Ian Macleod - Ottawa Citizen 53
Kristy Kirkup - The Canadian Press 51
Bruce Cheadle - The Canadian Press 50
Alex Schadenberg - National Post 44
Jonathan Charlton - Saskatoon StarPhoenix 43
Joan Bryden - The Canadian Press 40
Chart #1 - Opinions on the panel and consultation process
Figure5 - title
Chart 1 - Text equivalent

*A pie-chart depicting the overall percentage of media articles that were assessed as having positive, neutral or negative opinions in relation to the federal external panel and/or the consultation process. A “Positive” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were supportive of the consultation process or panel. A “Negative” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were critical of the consultation process or panel members. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that did not fall within the “Positive” or “Negative” categories.

The results were divided as follows: 90% Neutral, 7% Negative, and 3% Positive.

Positive: Supportive of the consultation process or panel members
Negative: Critical of the consultation process or panel members

Chart #2 - Opinions on assisted dying
Figure6 - title
Chart 2 - Text equivalent

* A pie-chart depicting the overall percentage of media articles that were assessed as being for, neutral or against assisted dying. A “For” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that are supportive or in favour of assisted dying. An “Against” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that are critical of or against assisted dying. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that do not fall within the “For” or “Against” categories.

The results were divided as follows: 53% Neutral, 30% For and 17% Against.

For: Supportive or in favour of assisted dying
Against: Critical of or against assisted dying

Coverage for:

Coverage against:

Opinions expressed in media coverage on assisted dying (Sep. 2014 - Jun. 2015)

Figure7 - title
Figure 7 - Text equivalent

* A cumulative bar graph depicting the percentages of articles that were assessed as expressing opinions that were for, neutral or against assisted dying for each month between September 2014 and June 2015. A “For” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were supportive or in favour of assisted dying. An “Against” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were critical of or against assisted dying. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that did not fall within the “For” or “Against” categories.

Percentage of articles by month that were For, Neutral, or Against were:

  For Neutral Against
Sep. 14 50% 35% 15%
Oct. 14 56% 25% 19%
Nov. 14 41% 46% 13%
Dec. 14 55% 30% 15%
Jan. 15 31% 65% 4%
Feb. 15 45% 38% 17%
Mar. 15 32% 51% 18%
Apr. 15 14% 57% 29%
May 15 13% 50% 38%
Jun. 15 14% 86% 0%

Note:Articles appearing in this section were selected to give examples of the most prominent articles for the month, with attention paid to non-neutral stories. In months with a particularly large percentage for or against, articles were chosen to give examples of coverage that led to this percentage.

September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015

Opinions expressed in media coverage on assisted dying (Jul. 2015 - Nov. 2015)

Figure8 - title
Figure 8 - Text equivalent

* A cumulative bar graph depicting the percentages of articles that were assessed as expressing opinions that were for, neutral or against assisted dying for each month between July 2015 and November 2015. A “For” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were supportive or in favour of assisted dying. An “Against” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were critical of or against assisted dying. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that did not fall within the “For” or “Against” categories.

Percentage of articles by month that were For, Neutral, or Against were:

  For Neutral Against
Jul. 15 24% 64% 12%
Aug. 15 32% 49% 19%
Sep. 15 23% 61% 16%
Oct. 15 19% 59% 22%
Nov. 15 9% 79% 11%
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015

Opinions on the panel and consultation process (Jul. 2015 - Nov. 2015)

Figure9 - title
Figure 9 - Text equivalent

* A cumulative bar graph listing percentages of media articles that were assessed as having positive, neutral or negative opinions in relation to the federal external panel and/or the consultation process for each month between July 2015 and November 2015. A “Positive” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were supportive of the consultation process or the panel. A “Negative” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that are critical of the consultation process or the panel. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that did not fall within the Positive or Negative categories.

The percentage of articles per month that were Positive, Neutral or Negative were:

  For Neutral Against
Jul. 15 0% 67% 33%
Aug. 15 9% 88% 2%
Sep. 15 11% 84% 5%
Oct. 15 3% 90% 7%
Nov. 15 0% 88% 12%

Opinions expressed in media coverage on assisted dying by region

Figure10 - title
Figure 10 - Text equivalent

* A cumulative bar graph listing the overall percentages of articles that were assessed as expressing opinions that were for, neutral or against assisted dying by 6 Canadian regions. A “For” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were supportive or in favour of assisted dying. An “Against” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that were critical of or against assisted dying. A “Neutral” opinion denotes the percentage of articles that did not fall within the “For” or “Against” categories.

Percentage of articles per region that were For, Neutral, or Against were:

  For Neutral Against
National 30% 50% 21%
BC 36% 52% 12%
Prairies 31% 52% 16%
Ontario 32% 56% 13%
Quebec 20% 62% 18%
Atlantic Canada 24% 53% 24%

Assisted dying coverage by region

British Columbia
Prairies
Ontario
Quebec
Atlantic Canada
Top regions
Figure11 - title
Graph - Text equivalent

*A bar graph listing the total number of media articles on assisted dying from regions in Canada. The "National" region corresponds to media articles from national media outlets as opposed to provincial or territorial media outlets.

Total number of articles from each region were:

Region Total
Ontario 3,735
National 1,949
British Columbia 1,468
Alberta 856
Quebec 710
Saskatchewan 571
Manitoba 281
New Brunswick 108
Nova Scotia 73
Prince Edward Island 31
Newfoundland 27
Yukon Territory 19
Northwest Territories 3

About MediaMiser

About MediaMiser:

MediaMiser clients, from Fortune 500 companies to startups to government departments, trust our web-based media monitoring and analysis solution. They count on us for timely traditional and social media analytics generated by our patented software, the customized reporting options provided by our responsive and proactive client services team, and our 24-hour technical support. We turn news into knowledge for clients based in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Australia.