Three Years On: Mentoring at the Department of Justice and the Public Prosecution Service of Canada

List of Tables

Table 1: Number of Members of Employment Equity Group Registered in the NMP – JUS and PPSC, March 31, 2011
Table 2: Gender of NMP Participants, JUS and PPSC, March 31, 2011
Table 3: Demographics of Survey Respondents, Associates and Mentors
Table 4: Whether respondents would recommend the NMP to others – Associates and Mentors
Table 5: Important issues and helpfulness of mentoring
Table 6: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Associates
Table 7: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Mentors
Table 8: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Associates
Table 9: Extent that mentoring relationship affected various areas – Mentors

Figure 1: How respondents became aware of the NMP
Figure 2: The usefulness of NMP services – Associates
Figure 3: The usefulness of NMP services – Mentors
Figure 4: Satisfaction with NMP staff service – Associates
Figure 5: Satisfaction with NMP staff service – Mentors
Figure 6: Overall satisfaction with the National Mentoring Program
Figure 7: Associates' satisfaction with the matching process
Figure 8: Length of time in current mentoring relationship
Figure 9: Frequency of meetings
Figure 10: How associate and mentors meet
Figure 11: Length of meetings
Figure 12: Associates' satisfaction with progress toward achieving goals
Figure 13: Satisfaction with the mentoring relationship – Associates and Mentors
Figure 14: Length of time in mentoring relationship when it ended
Figure 15: Frequency of meetings – ended relationships
Figure 16: How associates and mentors met – ended relationships
Figure 17: Length of meetings – ended relationships
Figure 18: Satisfaction with ended mentoring relationship