Evaluation of the Department of Justice Professional Development Function

Appendix A: Evaluation Matrix

Issues/Questions Indicators Data Sources Timing of Data Collection Responsibility for Data Collection

Outputs:

  • What types of internal PD activities were offered in 2016-17?
  • Number and nature (e.g., whether it is legal or non-legal training) of internal PD activities that have been offered to departmental employees
  • Administrative files (e.g., data and reports from iCase, CSPS reports, and PeopleSoft Training Self-Service)

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

Demographic information:

  • What is the demographic profile of employees who participated in PD activities (internal and external)?
  • Work unit (Portfolio, Branch, Sector, Region)
  • Classification
  • Employment status (indeterminate, term)
  • Gender
  • Years of service at Justice Canada
  • Years of service in federal government
  • Survey of employees
  • Administrative files
  • Assessment forms

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

Extent of participation in internal PD:

  • What is the level of participation in internal and external PD activities?
  • Number of employees who have participated in the internal PD activities offered by the Department (look at this by demographic profile)
  • Number of employees who have participated in external PD activities (look at this by demographic profile)
  • Survey of employees
  • Administrative files

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • What is the intensity of participation?
  • Average number of days/hours employees have participated in PD activities (internal and external to the Department)
  • Survey of employees
  • Administrative files

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • What types of PD activities do employees participate in?
  • Activity/event type (e.g., supervisory skills, personal development)
  • Category of training (e.g., legal knowledge, legal skills, non-legal training)
  • Internal vs external training (%, types, costs)
  • Survey of employees
  • Administrative files

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

Effectiveness:

  • To what extent do the internal and external PD activities taken by employees meet their needs?
  • % of employees who indicate that the types and frequency of internal and external PD activities meet their needs
  • % of employees who would like more internal and external PD than they received
  • Reasons that best explain what had prevented them from participating in more internal and external PD
  • Areas of their work where employees have the greatest PD need
  • Factors that facilitate/hinder participation in internal and external PD activities
  • Types of internal and external PD activities that are most effective in providing employees with the PD they need
  • Survey of employees
  • Post-training assessment forms

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • To what extent are the Department’s internal PD activities aligned with departmental priorities, priorities of the federal government, and continuing PD requirements of law societies?
  • Extent of alignment of internal PD activities with departmental and federal government priorities
  • Extent of alignment of internal PD activities requirements of law societies
  • Key informant interviews
  • Document review

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • Does access to internal and external PD vary across the Department?
  • Level of access (e.g., policies, approvals, availability, technology) to internal and external PD
  • Nature of barriers to accessing internal and external PD
  • Key informant interviews
  • Survey of employees

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • What has been the impact of the internal and external PD received?
  • Employees’ perceptions on the extent to which they apply knowledge and skills gained through internal and external PD when they return to work
  • Employees’ perceptions on the extent to which internal and external PD has led to positive changes (e.g., in job responsibilities, confidence, career advancement, effectiveness in job)
  • Survey of employees
  • Focus groups (if necessary)

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

Efficiency:

  • What is the governance structure of PD in the Department? Are the roles and responsibilities clear?
  • Description of governance structure of PD provided by key informants
  • Extent to which key informants believe that roles and responsibilities are clear
  • What information is tracked/monitored, how it is done and by whom?
  • Key informant interviews

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • What is the Department’s delivery model for internal and external PD?
  • Nature of delivery model(s)
  • Document review
  • Key informant interviews

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • To what extent are internal PD activities developed and/or delivered in a cost-effective manner?
  • Number, types and cost of CSPS courses taken by Justice Canada employees
  • Mechanisms in place to develop and deliver internal PD in a coordinated manner
  • Extent of overlap or duplication (e.g., with CSPS courses, across portfolios, internal vs external training)
  • Administrative files (e.g., financial reports)
  • Key informant interviews

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • Are there challenges to the development or delivery of internal PD activities at headquarters? In the regions?
  • Nature of challenges (e.g., location, connectivity, approvals, registration, contracting)
  • Types of mechanisms in place to address challenges
  • Document review
  • Key informant interviews

Evaluation

Evaluation Division

  • What best practices in support of internal PD exist within the Department?
  • Nature of best practices in support of internal PD within the Department
  • Key informant interviews
  • Administrative files

Evaluation

Evaluation Division