Appendix A: Evaluation Issues and Questions

Relevance

1.1. To what extent are the main functions of ARADS consistent with government priorities and departmental roles and responsibilities?

1.2. Has the need for ARADS’ support changed over the evaluation period and if so, how?

Design and Delivery

2.1 How effective is ARADS’ design and delivery model with respect to addressing issues of systemic racism and discrimination in Justice?

2.2 In what way does ARADS’ design and delivery of its activities facilitate or impede its success?

2.3 How effective are the methods used to monitor and measure ARADS’ progress in achieving expected results (e.g., the Results Framework and EE Plan)?

Effectiveness

3.1 How has ARADS contributed to Justice’s response to anti-racism, equity, diversity and inclusion priorities (e.g., related to the Clerk’s Call to Action on Anti-racism, Equity, and Inclusion in the Federal Public Service: to promote equity and inclusion in the public service and to foster a diverse workforce that is truly representative of all Canadians)?

3.2 To what extent has ARADS been successful in: