Pilot study of method to review closed organized crime files

4. The SPSS research database (cont'd)

D. CHARGE-LEVEL DATA

1. Charges Laid

In all, 1,487 charges were laid across all the files reviewed. For eleven accused, no charge was laid in Canada (for example, files with an extradition or mutual legal assistance request), for a total of 1,498 entries in the charge-level file. Charges were laid under the following Acts:

Table 3.7: Charges Laid by Statute
Act Number of Charges Percentage of Total Charges Laid
Criminal Code 619 41.6%
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act [2] 533 35.8%
Narcotic Control Act 198 13.3%
Excise Tax Act 70 4.7%
Income Tax Act 40 2.7%
Customs Act 12 1%
Immigration Act 9 < 1%
Immigration Protection Act 2 < 1%
Nature of charge undecipherable 4 < 1%

Specific sections of the Acts under which charges were laid are too numerous to mention here, although, in summary form for the three principal Acts, they are: Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

Among the conspiracy charges under the Criminal Code (465(1)), the majority, (just under 50%) were for trafficking. The table below shows the breakdown of conspiracy charges in the reviewed files by type of conspiracy.

Table 3.8: Nature of Conspiracy Charges under 465(1)
Nature of Conspiracy No. of charges Percentage of total conspiracy charges laid
Trafficking 232 49.4%
Importation 61 13%
Importing and Trafficking 54 11%
Smuggling Contraband 41 9%
Possession of Proceeds of Crime 23 4.9%
Cultivation 20 4.3%
Possession 15 3.2%
Possession for the purposes of trafficking 13 2.8%
Laundering proceeds of drugs 2 < 1%
Possession of a prohibited weapon 2 < 1%
Exportation 1 < 1%
Unspecified 6 < 1%

2. Disposition/Outcome (by charge)

Reporting disposition by charge was not possible because we were unable to reliably find specific outcomes for each and every charge for accused with multiple charges in the file review. In other words, information contained in the files on outcome, for accused with multiple charges, was often solely associated with the accused and not with each charge. While this information was not readily available from the hardcopy files, it may be available in CASEVIEW in the future.


[2] Which replaced the Narcotic Control Act