Managing Contact Difficulties: A Child-Centred Approach

2003-FCY-5E

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents
• Next Page

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Ahrons, C. 1981, The continuing coparental relationship between divorcing spouses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51: 415-428.
  
• 
  Ahrons, C. 1994, The good divorce: Keeping your family together when your marriage comes apart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  
• 
  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1997, Parameters for child custody evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36: 57S-68S.
  
• 
  American Psychiatric Association 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  
• 
  American Psychological Association 1994, Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49: 677-680.
  
• 
  Association of Family and Conciliation Courts 2000, Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38: 110-122.
  
• 
  Bacon, B. and McKenzie, B. 2001, Best practices in parent information and education programs after separation and divorce. Report prepared for Family Mediation Canada.
  
• 
  Bala, N. 2002, Sexual abuse allegations when parents have separated: Social context and evidentary issues. Paper presented at the Family Law Seminar of the National Judicial Institute. Toronto, February 14.
  
• 
  Bala, N., Paetsch, J., Trocmé, N., Schuman, J., Tanchak, S., and Hornick, J. 2001, Allegations of child abuse in the context of parental separation: A discussion paper. (Report). Ottawa: Family, Children and Youth Section, Department of Justice (Canada).
  
• 
  Baris, M. Coates, C. Duvall, B. Garrity, C. Johnson, E. and LaCrosse, E. 2001, Working with high-conflict families of divorce: A guide for professionals. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.
  
• 
  Berns, S. 2001, Parents behaving badly: Parental alienation syndrome in the Family Court—magic bullet or poisoned chalice?. Australian Journal of Family Law, 15: 191-214.
  
• 
  Birnbaum, R. and Radovanovic, H. 1999, Brief intervention model for access-based postseparation disputes. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37: 504-513.
  
• 
  Birks, S. 1998, The family court: a view from the outside-Issues Paper No. 3. Palmerston North, NZ: Centre for Public Policy Evaluation, College of Business, Massey University.
  
• 
  Blaikie, E. 2001, Keep the mediation process simple: It's my party and I'll go if I want to (Access issues). Paper presented to the Triennial New Zealand Law Society Conference and 4th New Zealand Family Law Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, October 6.
  
• 
  Boshier, P. 2001, Can we protect children and protect their rights? Letting children and youth speak out for themselves. Paper presented to the 2001 World Congress on Family Law and the Rights of Children and Youth, Bath, UK, September 21.
  
• 
  Bresee, P., Stearns, G., Bess, B., and Packer, L. 1986, Allegations of child sexual abuse in child custody disputes: A therapeutic assessment model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56: 560-569.
  
• 
  Brown, C. 1996, Children's wishes in custody and access disputes: An overview. Paper presented at Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Annual Conference, May 8-11, San Antonio, TX.
  
• 
  Bruch, C. 2001, Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35: 527-552.
  
• 
  Cartwright, G. 1993, Expanding the parameters of parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21: 205-215.
  
• 
  Chisholm, R. 2001, Reforming custody law: Recent Australian experience. Paper presented at the Third World Congress on Family Law and the Rights of Children and Youth, Bath, UK, September.
  
• 
  Clark, A. and Moss, P. 2001, Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. London: National Children's Bureau.
  
• 
  Clawar, S. and Rivlin, B 1991, Children held hostage: Dealing with programmed and brainwashed children. Washington: American Bar Association Section on Family Law.
  
• 
  Cossman, B. 2001, An analysis of options for changes in the legal regulation of child custody and access. (Report). Ottawa: Family, Children and Youth Section, Department of Justice (Canada).
  
• 
  Cossman, B. and Mykitiuk, R. 1998, Child custody and access—Discussion paper. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 15: 13-78.
  
• 
  Cossman, B. and Rogerson, C. 1997, Case study in the provision of legal aid: Family law. In A blueprint for publicly funded legal services (Volume 3): Report of the Ontario Legal Aid Review. Toronto: Province of Ontario.
  
• 
  Darnall, D. 1998, Divorce casualties: protecting your children from parental alienation. Dallas, TX: Taylor Publishing Co.
  
• 
  1997, A broader definition of parental alienation.
  
• 
  Department of Justice 2002, Minister of Justice announces the child-centred family justice strategy. News release issued by the Department of Justice, December 10.
  
• 
  Dunn, J. and Deater-Deckard, K. 2001, Children's views of their changing families. London: YPS.
  
• 
  Dunne, J. and Hedrick, M. 1994, The parental alienation syndrome: An analysis of sixteen selected cases. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21: 21-38.
  
• 
  Ellis, E. 2000, Divorce wars: Interventions with families in conflict. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  
• 
  Emery, R. 1994, Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. New York: Guilford Press.
  
• 
  Emery, R. and Kelly, J. 2002, Resiliency in children of divorce. Paper presented at the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Annual Conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, June 5-8.
  
• 
  Etemad, J. 1997, The parental alienation syndrome: A guide for mental health and legal professionals, 2d ed. (Review). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38: 223.
  
• 
  Faller, K. 2002, Understanding and assessing child sexual maltreatment (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications. Forthcoming book.
  
• 
  Faller, K. 1997, The parental alienation syndrome: What is it and what data support it? Child Maltreatment, 3: 100-115.
  
• 
  Families in Transition 1998, Kids talk about divorce (video). Toronto: Family Service Association of Toronto.
  
• 
  Freckleton, I. and Selby, H. 2002, Expert evidence: Law, practice, procedure and advocacy (Second edition) Update 2. Sydney, Australia: The Law Book Company.
  
• 
  Freeman, R. 1998, Parenting after divorce: Using research to inform decision-making about children. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 15: 79-130.
  
• 
  1995, Successful family transition: An evaluation of intervention strategies. Toronto: Family Service Association of Metropolitan Toronto.
  
• 
  Freeman, R. and Freeman, G. 2001, Appendix A: Report on youth workshops. In IER Planning, Research, and Management Services, Custody, Access and Child Support in Canada: Report on Federal-Provincial-Territorial Consultations, Ottawa: Department of Justice (Canada), 89-104.
  
• 
  Furstenberg, F. 1990, Divorce and the American family. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 379-403.
  
• 
  Gardner, R. 2001, Parental alienation syndrome vs. parental alienation: Which diagnosis should evaluators use in child-custody disputes? The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 93-115.
  
• 
  2001a, The recent gender shift in parental alienation syndrome indoctrinators. News for Women in Psychiatry 9: 11-13.
  
• 
  2001b, Therapeutic interventions for children with PAS. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics, Inc.
  
• 
  2001c, Should courts order PAS children to visit/reside with the alienated parent?: A follow-up study. The American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19: 61-106.
  
• 
  2001d, Parental alienation syndrome (PAS): Sixteen years later. Academy Forum, 45: 10-12.
  
• 
  2001e, Misperceptions versus facts about the contributions of Richard A. Gardner, M.D.
  
• 
  1999a, Differentiating between the parental alienation syndrome and bona fide abuse/neglect. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27: 97-107.
  
• 
  1999b, Family therapy of the moderate type of parental alienation syndrome. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27: 195-212.
  
• 
  1999c, Guidelines for assessing parental preference in child-custody disputes. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 30: 1-9.
  
• 
  1998a, Recommendations for dealing with parents who induce a parental alienation syndrome in their children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 28: 1-23.
  
• 
  1998b, The Burgess decision and the Wallerstein brief. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26: 425-431.
  
• 
  1992, The parental alienation syndrome: A guide for mental health and legal professionals. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics, Inc.
  
• 
  1985, Recent trends in divorce and custody litigation. Academy Forum, 29: 3-7.
  
• 
  Undated a, Testimony concerning the parental alienation syndrome has been admitted in courts of law in many states and countries.
  
• 
  Undated b, A brief introduction to PAS: Basic facts about the parental alienation syndrome.
  
• 
  Undated c, Differential diagnosis and treatment of the three types of PAS. Creative Therapeutics Inc.
  
• 
  Undated d, Basic facts about the parental alienation syndrome.
  
• 
  Garrity, C. and Baris, M. 1994, Caught in the middle: Protecting the children of high conflict divorce. New York: Lexington Books.
  
• 
  Gold, L. 1992, Between love and hate: A guide to civilized divorce. New York: Plume Books.
  
• 
  Gollop, M., Smith, A. and Taylor, N. 2000, Children's involvement in custody and access arrangements after parental separation. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 12: 383-399.
  
• 
  Gould, J. 1998, Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  
• 
  Government of Canada 2002, Bill C-22. An act to amend the Divorce Act, the Family Orders and Agreements Enforcement Assistance Act, the Garnishment, Attachment and Pension Diversion Act and the Judges Act and to amend other Acts in consequence. Downloaded from http://www.parl.gc.ca37/2/parlbus/chambus/house/bills…/C-22_cover-E.htm.
  
• 
  1986, Divorce Act – R.S., 1985, c.3 (2nd Supp.).
  
• 
  Grant, M. and Sobel, M. 2002, High conflict, low budget: Doing more with less. Paper presented at the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Annual Conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, June 5-8.
  
• 
  Hawthorne, J., Jessop, J., Pryor, J. and Richards, M. 2002, Separation, divorce and family change: A review of interventions and support services for children. Report to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  
• 
  Hayward, S. 1999, A guide to the parental alienation syndrome. Retrieved from http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/pas-hayward.htm.
  
• 
  Hetherington, M. (Ed.) 1999, Coping with Divorce: A risk and resiliency perspective. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  
• 
  Hetherington, M. 1989, Coping with family transitions: Winners, losers, and survivors. Child Development, 60: 1-14.
  
• 
  Hetherington, M. and Kelly, J. 2002, For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  
• 
  Hewitt, K. 1996, Divorce and parental disagreement. Family Law, 26: 368-371.
  
• 
  Hobbs, T. 2002, Parental alienation syndrome and UK Family Courts—the dilemma. Family Law, 381-387.
  
• 
  Holman, E. and Irvine, J. 2002, Alienation, undermining and obstruction: A field guide for professionals. Paper presented at the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Annual Conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, June 5-8.
  
• 
  IER Planning, Research and Management Services 2001, Custody, access and child support in Canada. Report on Federal-Provincial-Territorial Consultations. Ottawa: Department of Justice (Canada).
  
• 
  Issaacs, M., Montalvo, B., and Abelsohn, D. 1987, The difficult divorce: Therapy for children and families. New York: Basic Books.
  
• 
  Jaffe, P. and Geffner, R. 1998, Child custody disputes and domestic violence: Critical issues for mental health, social service and legal professionals. In Holden, G., Geffner, R. and Jouriles, E. (Eds.). Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues. Washington: American Psychological Association.
  
• 
  Jaffe, P., Wolfe, D. and Wilson, S. 1990, Children of battered women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  
• 
  Jameson, B. 1999, Child custody and access: The views and practices of psychologists and lawyers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
  
• 
  Johnston, J. In press, Parental alignments and rejection: An empirical study of alienation in children of divorce. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
  
• 
  2001, Rethinking parental alienation and redesigning parent-child access services for children who resist or refuse visitation. Paper presented at the international Conference on Supervised Visitation, Staatsinstitut fur Fruhpadagogik Munich, Germany, July 9-10.
  
• 
  1993, Children of divorce who refuse visitation. In Depner, C. and Bray, J. (Eds.). Non-residential parenting: New vistas in family living, 109-193. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications.
  
• 
  Johnston, J. and Campbell, L. 1988, Impasses of divorce: The dynamics and resolution of family conflict. New York: The Free Press.
  
• 
  Johnston, J. and Roseby, V. 1997, In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York: The Free Press.
  
• 
  Johnston, J., Walters, M. and Friedlander, S. 2001, Therapeutic work with alienated children and their families. Family Court Review, 39: 316-333.
  
• 
  Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2002, Divorced parents ‘make conflict worse by going to court over child contact'. Downloaded from http://www.jrf.org.uk/pressroom/releases/301002.asp.
  
• 
  Kalter, N. 1990, Growing up with divorce. New York: The Free Press.
  
• 
  Kelly, J. 2000, Children's adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce: A decade review of research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39: 785-963.
  
• 
  Kelly, J. and Johnston, J. 2001, The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39: 249-266.
  
• 
  King, V. and Heard, H. 1997, Nonresident father visitation, parental conflict, and mothers' satisfaction: What's best for child well-being? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61: 385-396.
  
• 
  Kinnear, P. 2002, New families for changing times. Discussion Paper No. 47. Canberra, Australia: The Australia Institute.
  
• 
  Kopetski, L. 1998, Identifying cases of parent alienation syndrome: Part I and Part II. Colorado Lawyer, 29: 61-68.
  
• 
  Laing, M. 1999, For the sake of the children: Preventing reckless new laws. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 16: 229-282.
  
• 
  Lampel, A. 2001, Assessing for alienation and access in child custody cases: A response to Lee and Olesen. Family Court Review, 40: 232-235.
  
• 
  1996, Child's alignment with parents in highly conflicted custody cases. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34: 232-235.
  
• 
  Landau, B. 1995, The Toronto forum on woman abuse: The process and outcome. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33: 75-76.
  
• 
  Le Bourdais, C., Juby, H. and Marcil-Gratton, N. 2001, Keeping contact with children: Assessing the father/child post-separation relationship from the male perspective. Ottawa: Family, Children and Youth Section, Department of Justice (Canada).
  
• 
  Lee, S. and Olesen, N. 2001, Assessing for alienation in child custody and access evaluations. Family Court Review, 39: 282-298.
  
• 
  Lewis, J. and Sammons, W. 1999, Don't divorce your children: Children and their parents talk about divorce. Lincolnwood, IL: Contemporary Books.
  
• 
  Lowenstein, L. 1998, Parent alienation syndrome: A two step approach toward a solution. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20: 505-520.
  
• 
  Lund, M. 1995, A therapist's view of parental alienation syndrome. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33: 308-316.
  
• 
  Lyon, C., Surrey, E. and Timms, J. 1998, Effective support services for children and young people when parental relationships break down: A child-centred approach. Paper prepared for Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation (UK).
  
• 
  Maccoby, E. and Mnookin, R. 1992, Dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  
• 
  Mahony, P. 2001, Address to caring fathers support and education. Christchurch, New Zealand, February 19.
  
• 
  Marcil-Gratton, N. and Le Bourdais, C. 1999, Custody, access and child support: Findings from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Ottawa: Child Support Team, Department of Justice Canada Research Report CSR-1999-3E.
  
• 
  Mason, M. 1999, The custody wars: Why children are losing the legal battle and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.
  
• 
  McDonough, H. and Bartha, C. 1999, Putting children first: A guide for parents breaking up. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  
• 
  McGleughlin, J., Meyer, S. and Baker, J. 1999, Assessing sexual abuse allegations in divorce, custody, and visitation disputes, 357-388. In Galatzer-Levy, R. and Kraus, L. (Eds.). The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  
• 
  Mercer, D. and Kline Pruett, M. 2001, Your divorce advisor: A lawyer and a psychologist guide you through the legal and emotional landscape of divorce. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  
• 
  Morrow, V. 1998, Understanding families: Children's perspectives. London: National Children's Bureau.
  
• 
  Mullane, G. 1998, "Better use of social science research in the family court"-Empirical research in decision making. Paper presented at the Third National Family Court Conference, October 20-24, Melbourne, Australia.
  
• 
  Murray, K. 1999, When children refuse to visit parents: Is prison an appropriate remedy? Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37: 83-98.
  
• 
  Ney, T. and Blank, K.  , In preparation Leveling conflict(ing) discourses in high conflict divorce cases. Paper submitted for publication.
  
• 
  Nicholson, A. 2002a, Australian initiatives: Enforcement in difficult contact cases. Paper presented to The Royal Society, London, UK, March.
  
• 
  2002b, Setting the scene: Australian family law and the Family Court—A perspective from the bench. Family Court Review, 40: 279-296.
  
• 
  1977, Court management of cases involving child abuse allegations. Keynote address presented to 7th Annual Australasian Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, Perth, Australia, October 19.
  
• 
  Pam, A. and Pearson, T. 1998, Splitting up: Enmeshment and estrangement in the process of divorce. New York: The Guilford Press.
  
• 
  Penfold, S. 1995, Medacious Moms or devious Dads? Some perplexing issues in child custody/sexual abuse allegation disputes. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 40: 337-341.
  
• 
  Peralta-Vaughn, K. 2001, Divorced parents' alienation behavior: Adult children and attorneys' perspectives. Unpublished honors dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
  
• 
  Price, J. and Pioske, K. 1994, Parental alienation syndrome: A developmental analysis of a vulnerable population. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 32: 9-12.
  
• 
  Province of Ontario 1989, Chapter C.12. Children's Law Reform Act. Downloaded from http://192.75.156.68/DBLaws/Statutes?English?90c12_3.htm.
  
• 
  Pruett, K. and Pruett, M. 1999, "Only God decides": Young children's perceptions of divorce and the legal system. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38: 1544-1550.
  
• 
  Pryor, J. and Rodgers, B. 2001, Children in changing families: Life after parental separation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  
• 
  Quigley, A. 2000, Listening to children's views: The findings and recommendations. London, YPS.
  
• 
  Racusin, R., Copans, S. and Mills, P. 1994, Characteristics of families of children who refuse post-divorce visits. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50: 792-801.
  
• 
  Ramsey, S. 2000, High-conflict custody cases: Reforming the system for children: Conference report and action plan. American Bar Association, Center on Children and the Law.
  
• 
  Rand, D. 1997, The spectrum of parental alienation syndrome, Parts I and II. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15: 23-52.
  
• 
  Rhoades, H. In press, Contextualising contact enforcement disputes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  
• 
  Rybicki, D. undated, Parental alienation and enmeshment issues in child custody cases. Expert Witness Testimony & Forensic Psychology. Forthcoming.
  
• 
  Samenow, S. 2002, In the best interest of the child: How to protect your child from the pain of your divorce. NY: Crown Publishers.
  
• 
  Sheehan, G. 2000, Families, divorce and family law. Family Matters, Autumn, retrieved from http://www.findarticles.com.
  
• 
  Simpson, B., McCarthy, P. and Walker, J. 1995, Renegotiating fatherhood: Drop-out fathers and dead-beat Dads? Newcastle upon Tyne: Relate Centre for Family Studies, Newcastle University.
  
• 
  Smart, C. 2002, From children's shoes to children's voices. Family Court Review, 40: 307-319.
  
• 
  Smart, C. and Neal, B. 2000, ‘It's my life too'—children's perspectives on post-divorce parenting. Family Law, 30: 163-169.
  
• 
  Smith, R. and Coukos, P. 1997, "Fairness and accuracy in evaluations of domestic violence and child abuse in custody determinations." Judges Journal, Fall, 38-42 and 54-55.
  
• 
  Smith, A. and Gollop, M. 2001, What children think separating parents should know. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30: 23-31.
  
• 
  Special Joint Parliamentary Committee on Child Custody and Access 1998, For the sake of the children: Report of the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Download from http://www.canada.gc.ca/InfoComDoc/ 36/1/SJCA/Studies/rep-rap/sjcarp02-3.htm.
  
• 
  Stahl, P. 2000, Parenting after divorce: A guide to resolving conflicts and meeting your children's needs. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers, Inc.
  
• 
  Stahl, P. 1999, Complex issues in child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  
• 
  Statistics Canada 2002a, Changing conjugal life in Canada. The Daily, July 12.
  
• 
  2002b, Divorces: 1999 and 2000. The Daily, December 2.
  
• 
  Steinberg, A., Woodhouse, B. and Cowan, A. 2002, Child-centered, vertically structured, and interdisciplinary: An integrative approach to children's policy, practice, and research. Family Court Review, 40: 116-134.
  
• 
  Stoltz, J. and Ney, T. 2002, Resistance to visitation: Rethinking parental and child alienation, Family Court Review, 40: 220-241.
  
• 
  Sturge, C. and Glaser, D. 2000, Contact and domestic violence—The experts' court report. Family Law, 30: 615‑629.
  
• 
  Sullivan, M. and Kelly, J. 2001, Legal and psychological management of cases with an alienated child. Family Court Review, 39: 299-315.
  
• 
  Swerdlow-Freed, D. Undated, Parental alienation syndrome. Downloaded from http://www.divorceonline.com/articles/2197.htm
  
• 
  Thayer, E. and Zimmerman, J. 2001, The co-parenting survival guide: Letting go of conflict after a difficult divorce. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
  
• 
  Trinder, L., Beek, M. and Connolly, J. 2002, Making contact: How parents and children negotiate and experience contact after divorce. Layerthrope, York (UK): York Publishing Services.
  
• 
  Turkat, I. 1997, Management of visitation interference. The Judges Journal, 36: 17-47.
  
• 
  Vanier Institute of the Family 2000, Profiling Canada's families II. Ottawa: Vanier Institute of the Family.
  
• 
  Vestal, A. 1999, Mediation and parental alienation syndrome. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37: 487-503.
  
• 
  Wade, A. and Smart, C. 2002, Facing family change: Children's circumstances, strategies and resources. London: YPS.
  
• 
  Waldron, K. and Joanis, D. 1996, Understanding and collaboratively treating parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Family Law, 20: 121-133.
  
• 
  Wall, N., Boyd-Carpenter, T., Angell, N., Kaplan, C., Skidmore, D., Simpson, J., and Wells, T. 2002, Making contact work: A report presented to the Lord Chancellor on the facilitation of arrangements for contact between children and their non-residential parents and the enforcement of court orders for contact. Downloaded from http://www.dca.gov.uk/family/abfl.pdf PDF Help .
  
• 
  Wallerstein, J. 1985, Children of divorce: Emerging trends. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8: 837-855.
  
• 
  Wallerstein, J. and Kelly, J. 1985, Surviving the breakup: How children and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.
  
• 
  Wallerstein, J. and Kelly, J. 1980, The effects of divorce on the father-child relationship. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137: 1534-39.
  
• 
  Wallerstein, J., Lewis, J. and Blakeslee, S. 2000, The unexpected legacy of divorce: A 25-year landmark study. New York, NY: Hyperion.
  
• 
  Ward, P. and Harvey, J. 1993, Family wars: The alienation of children. New Hampshire Bar Journal.
  
• 
  Warshak, R. 2002, Misdiagnosis of parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20: 31-51.
  
• 
  2001, Divorce poison: Protecting the parent-child bond from a vindictive ex. New York: Regan Books.
  
• 
  2000a, Current controversies regarding parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19: 29-59.
  
• 
  2000b, Remarriage as a trigger of parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28: 229-241.
  
• 
  2000c, Obstacles and controversies in the pursuit of children's best interests. Keynote Address at the annual conference of the Arizona Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Sedona, AZ.
  
• 
  Willbourne, C. and Cull, L. 1997, The emerging problem of parental alienation. Family Law, December, 27, 807-8.
  
• 
  Williams, F. 1990, Preventing parentectomy following divorce. Keynote Address, Fifth Annual Conference, National Council for Children's Rights, Washington, DC, October 1990.
  
• 
  Williams, J. 2001, Should judges close the gate on PAS and PA? Family Court Review, 39: 267-281.
  
• 
  Zirogiannis, L. 2001, Evidentiary issues with parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39: 334-343.
  

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents
• Next Page