Changements d’attitudes chez les participants aux Programmes d’intervention auprès des partenaires violents (PIPV) : un projet pilote

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante

Bibliographie

• ANDREWS, D.A., I. ZINGER, R. D. HOGE, J. BONTA, P. GENDREAU et F.T. CULLEN. « Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis », Criminology, vol. 28 (1990), p. 369-404.
• BABCOCK, J., C. E. GREENE et C. ROBIE. « Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment »,Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 23 (2004), p. 1023-1053.
• BAXTER, D., I., M. BURCHILL et M. TWEEDALE. The Attitudes Toward Correctional Treatment Scale, Merrickville, ministère du Solliciteur général et des Services correctionnels, 1992.
• BOURGEOIS, L., S. SABOURIN et J. WRIGHT. « Predictive validity of therapeutic alliance in group marital therapy », Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 58 (1990), p. 608-613.
• BUDMAN, S.H., A. DEMBY, M. FELDSTEIN, J. REDONDO, B.SCHERZ, M.J. BENNETT, G. KOPPENAAL, B.S. DALEY, M. HUNTER et J. ELLIS. « Preliminary findings on a new instrument to measure cohesion in group psychotherapy », International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, vol. 37 (1987), p. 75-94.
• BURT, M.R. « Cultural myths and supports for rape », Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, vol.38, n° 2 (1980), p. 217-230.
• BUZAWA, E., G. HOTALING et A. KLEIN. « The response to domestic violence in a model court: Some initial findings and implications », Behavioral Sciences and the Law, vol.16 (1998), p. 185-206.
• CAESAR, C.A. « Client's perceived trust, trustworthiness, and expectations in the therapeutic relationship », Factors in satisfaction with counselling received, (these de doctorat non publiée), University of Florida, 1996.
• CAMPBELL, J. C. « Wife-battering: Cultural contexts versus Western social sciences », dans D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown, et coll. (dir.). Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives. Women in cross-cultural perspective, (p. 229-249), Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1992.
• CENTRE NATIONAL D'INFORMATION SUR LA VIOLENCE DANS LA FAMILLE. Répertoire canadien des programmes de traitement pour les hommes violents envers leur conjointe, Ottawa (Ontario), Santé Canada, 2002.
• CONNORS, G. J., K. M.CARROLL, C. C. DICLEMENTE, R. LONGABAUGH et D.M. DONOVAN. « The therapeutic alliance and its relationship to alcoholism treatment participation and outcome », Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 41 (1997),p. 588-598.
• DANKWORT, J. et J. AUSTIN. « Standards for batterer intervention programs in Canada A history and review »s, Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health = Revue canadienne de santé mentale communautaire, vol. 18, n° 1 (1999), p. 19-38.
• DAVIS, R., B. TAYLOR et C. MAXWELL. Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn, Final report to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, 2000.
• DOBASH, R. E. et R. P. DOBASH. Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. NewYork, NY, Free Press, 2000.
• FEDER, L. et D. FORDE. A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment, rapport final présenté au National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, 2000.
• GLICK, P. et S.T. FISKE. « The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 70, n° 3 (1996), p. 491-512.
• HAJ-YAHIA, M. M. « Beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian women: The influence of their patriarchal ideology », Violence Against Women, vol. 4, n° 5 (1998), p. 533-558.
• HAJ-YAHIA, M. M. « The incidence of wife abuse and battering and some sociodemographic correlates as revealed by two National surveys in Palestinian society », Journal of Family Violence, vol. 15 (2000), p. 347-374.
• HOWELLS, K. et A. DAY. « Readiness for anger management: Clinical and theoretical issues », Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 23 (2003), p. 319-337.
• JENNINGS, J. L. « History and issues in the treatment of battering men: A case for unstructured group therapy », Journal of Family Violence, vol. 2 (1987),p. 193-213.
• LEVINSON, D. « Family violence in cross-cultural perspective », dans V.B. Van hasselt, R.L. Morrison, A.S. Bellack, et M. Hersen (dir.), Handbook of Family Violence, New York, NY, Plenum Press, 1987.
• MIHALIC, S. W. et D. ELLIOTT. « A social learning theory model of marital violence », Journal of Family Violence, vol. 12, (1997),p. 21-47.
• MURPHY, C. M., P. H. MUSSER et K. I. MATON. « Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism », Journal of Family Violence, vol. 13 (1998), p.263-284.
• PEARSON, A.W. « An assessment and refinement of Jehn's Intragroup conflict Scale », The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 13, n° 2 (2002), p. 110-126.
• PETRIK, N. D., R. E. OLSON et L. S. SUBOTNIK. « Powerlessness and the need to control: The male abuser's dilemma », Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 9 (1994), p. 278-285.
• PIZZEY, E. Crie moins fort, les voisins vont t'entendre, Paris, Des femmes, 1975.
• ROBERTS, A. « Intervention with the abusive partner », dans A. Roberts, (dir), Battered Women and their Families, New York, Springer, 1984.
• SALTER, A. C. Treating child sex offenders and victims: A practical guide,Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 1988.
• SAUNDERS, D. « Helping husbands who batter », Social Casework, vol. 65 (1984), p. 347-353.
• SAUNDERS, D.G., A.B. LYNCH, M. GRAYSON et D. LINZ. « The inventory of Beliefs aboutv Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes », Violence and Victims, vol. 2, n° 1 (1987), p. 39-58.
• SCOTT, K. L. « Predictors of change among male batterers: Application of theories and review of empirical findings », Trauma, Violence, et Abuse, A Review Journal, vol. 5 (2004), p.260-284.
• SCOTT, K. L. et M. A. STRAUS. Denial, partner-blaming and intimate partner abuse, en préparation.
• SCOTT, K. L. et D.A. WOLFE. « Readiness to change as a predictor of outcome in batterer treatment », Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 71 (2003), p. 879-889.
• SERIN, R. « Réponse au traitement, intervention et réinsertion sociale: un modèle théorique », Forum - Recherche sur l'actualité correctionnelle, vol. 10, n° 1 (1998), p. 29-32.
• SPENCE, J. T. et R. HELMREICH. Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1978.
• STITH, S. M. et S. C. FARLEY. « A predictive model of male spousal violence », Journal of Family Violence, vol. 8 (1993), p.183-201.
• STRAUS, M.A. « State-to-state differences in social inequality and social bonds in relation to assault on wives in the United States », Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 25 (1994), p. 7-24.
• SWIM, J.K., K.J. AIKIN, W.S. HALL et B.A. HUNTER. « Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices », Journal of Personality et Social Psychology, vol. 68, n° 2 (1995), p. 199-214.
• SYKES, G. M. et D. MATZA. « Techniques of neutralization: A theory of Delinquency », American Sociological Review, vol. 22 (1957), p. 664-670.
• TAFT, C. T., C. M. MURPHY, D. W. KING, P. H. MUSSER et J. M. DEDEYN. « Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men », Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 71 (2003), p. 812-820.
• WARD, C. « Attitudes toward male-female relationships and rape justification beliefs in Singapore », dans I. R. Lagunes, et Y.H. Poortinga (dir.), From a different perspective: Studies of behavior across cultures, (p.175-195), Netherlands, Swets et Zeitlinger B.V., 1985.

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante