Analyse des services d'avocats de garde requis selon l'arrêt Brydges

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

• Arboleda-Florez, J., Mental illness and violence: An epidemiological appraisal of the evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 43, p. 989-996. 1998
• Bala, N., Young Offenders Law. Ontario: Irwin Law. 1998.
• Blaauw, E., Kerkhof, A. et Vermunt, R., Psychopathology in police custody. International Journal of Law and Psychology, vol. 21, p. 73-87. 1998.
• B.C. Legal Services Society(2002/2003-2004/2005. Service Plan. Extrait le 4 juin 2002 du site http://www.lss.bc.ca
• Bland, R., Newman, S., Thompson, A. et Dyck, R., Psychiatric disorders in the population and prisoners. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol. 21, ).   273-279. 1998.
• Boland, F., Burrill, R., Duwyn, M. et Karp, J. Syndrome fœtal d'intoxication alcoolique : Répercussions pour le service correctionnel. Service correctionnel du Canada.1998. Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r71/r71e_f.shtml
• Boland, F., Henderson, K. et Baker, J., Examen des besoins des délinquants : Le domaine de la toxicomanie. Service correctionnel du Canada. 1998. Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r75/r75e_f.shtml
• Brink, J, Dohery, D. et Boer, A., Mental disorder in federal offenders: A Canadian prevalence study. International Journal of Law et Psychology, Vol. 24, 339-356. 2001.
• Brown, D., Ellis, T. et Larcombe, K., Changing the Code: Police detention under the PACE codes of practice. London: HMSO. 1992.
• Bucke, T. et Brown, D., In police custody: Police powers and suspects' rights under the revised PACE codes of practice. London: Home Office. 1997.
• Buckley, M. . The legal aid crisis: Time for action. Association du Barreau canadien. 2000.
• Cassell, P.G. et Hayman., Dialogue on Miranda: Police interrogation n the 1990's: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA Law Review, 43, 839. 1996.
• Cassell, P.G. et Fowles, R., Handcuffing the cops? A thirty-year perspective on Miranda's harmful effect on law enforcement. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1055-1172. 1998.
• Cao, L. et Huang, B., Determinants of citizen complaints against police abuse of power. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28,. 203-213. 2000.
• Cloud, M., Sheperd, G., Nodvin Barkoff, A. et Shur, J. . Words without meaning: The constitution, confessions, and mentally retarded suspects. University of Chicago Law Review,69, 495-624. 2002.
• Coles, E.M. et Jang, D., A psychological perspective on the legal concepts of "volition" and "intent." Journal of Law and Medicine, 4,60-71. 1996.
• Conseil national du bien-être social.   L'aide juridique et les pauvres : Comment améliorer l'aide juridique. Réseau d'accès à la justice. 1995. Extrait le 23 nov. 2001 du site www.acjnet.org/docs/pauvres.html
• Crawford, K., Invoking the Miranda right to counsel. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 64, 27-33. 1995.
• Cunnien, A.J., Alcoholic blackouts: Phenomenology and legal relevance. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 73-85. 1986.
• Currie, A., Legal aid delivery models in Canada: Past experience and future Developments. The International Legal Aid Conference, Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique. 1999.
• Currie, A., Projet de services d'avocat autochtone de garde du Nouveau-Brunswick. Ottawa : ministère de la Justice du Canada. 2000. Extrait le 2 juillet 2002 du site canada.justice.gc.ca/fra/pi/rs/rep/rr00-12a-f.pdf
• Durno, B., President's Report. Ontario Criminal Lawyers Association Newsletter. Vol, 4,   1-3. 1994. Extrait le 2 juillet 2002 du sitehttp://www.criminallawyers.ca/
• Easton, S., The case for the right to silence.Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company. 1998
• Edwards, A. The exercise of police powers in Queensland: The defendant's perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 30, 217-236. 1997.
• Endicott, O., Personnes souffrant de déficience intellectuelle et qui sont incarcérées pour des délits criminels : Examen de la documentation. Service correctionnel du Canada. 1991.. Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r14/r14e_f.shtml
• Harvie, R. et Foster, H., Different drummers, different drums: The Supreme Court of Canada, American jurisprudence and the continuing revision of Criminal Law under the Charter. Ottawa Law Review, 24,39-115. 1992.
• Hendrie, E.M., Beyond Miranda. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66,25-33. 1997
• Jacobs, J.B., The evolution of U.S. criminal law. Issues of Democracy, IIP Electronic Journals, 6, 6-15. 2001.
• Johnsen, J.,   Studies of legal needs and legal aid in a marker context. The International Legal Aid Conference. 1999.   Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site http://flair.law.ubc.ca/ilac/Papers/11%20Johnsen.html
• Laing, J.M.,   The police surgeon and mentally disordered suspects: An adequate safeguard? Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 1. 1996. Extrait le 31 juillet 2002 du site http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1996/issue1/laing1.html
• Lancaster, J., Saskatchewan. The International Legal Aid Conference. 1999. Extrait le 6 juin 2002 du sitehttp://flair.ubc.ca/ilac/Papers/13%20Lancaster.html
• Latzer, B., State constitutional developments. Criminal Law Bulletin, 36, 148-163. 2000.
• Legal Services Commission.   The Criminal Defence Service. London: Legal Services Commission. 2001. Extrait le 4 août 2002 du site www.legalservices.gov.uk/cds/index.htm
• Legal Services Commission.   The duty solicitor manual. London: Legal Services Commission. 2002. Extrait le 4 août 2002 du site http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/cds/duty_solicitor_manual
• Leo, R.A., The impact of Miranda revisited. Journal of Criminal Law et Criminology, 86, 621-693. 1996.
• Leo, R. A., Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century.Michigan Law Review, 99, 1000-1029. 2001.
• Littlechild, B.   The social worker as appropriate adult under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Birmingham: The British Association of Social Workers. 1996.
• Lord Chancellor's Department.   Criminal Defence Service: Choice of representative consultation paper. 2001a)Extrait le 5 août 2002 du site http://www.lcd.gov.uk/consult/saldef/chrepresp.htm
• Lord Chancellor's Department.   Criminal Defence Service: Establishing a salaried defence service. London: Lord Chancellor's Dept. 2001b) Extrait le 5 août 2002 du site http://www.lcd.gov.uk/consult/saldef/saldefresp.htm
• Mason, A., Canada. In Dirk van Zyl Smit and Frieder Dunkel (Eds.). Imprisonment today and tomorrow: International perspectives on prisoners' rights and prison conditions. Hague: Kluwer Law International. 2001.
• McCoy, R., Note: Is there a need for Miranda: A look at Australian and Canadian interrogation. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 17,627-649. 2000
• McDonald, S., The right to know: Women, ethnicity, violence and learning about the Law. Ph, D. Thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. 2000.
• Medford, S., Gudjonsson, G. et Pearce, J., The identification of persons at risk in police custody. London: Institute of Psychiatry at the Maudsley. 2000.
• Motiuk, L. et Porporino, F., La prévalence, la nature et la gravité des problèmes de santé mentale chez les détenus de sexe masculin sous la responsabilité fédérale dans les pénitenciers du Canada. Service correctionnel du Canada. 1991. Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r24/r24e_f.shtml
• Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General. The expanding role of corrections 2001. Extrait le 31 juillet 2002 du site www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/corr/strategic_plan/expand.htm
• Nami.The criminalization of people with mental illness.2002. Extrait le 14 août 2002 du site http://www.nami.org/update/unitedcriminal.html
• National Equal Justice Library., Legal aid in England. Washington, D.C.: Washington College of Law, American University. 2002. Extrait le 4 août 2002 du site http://www.equaljusticelibrary.org.cnhost.com/international/english.asp
• Nemetz, T. et Bean, P., Protecting the rights of the mentally disordered in police stations: The use of the appropriate adult in England and Wales. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24,595-605. 2001.
• Ontario Legal Aid Plan   (Régime d'aide juridique de l'Ontario). Proposed pilot projects: Final Report. 1998. Extrait le 18 août 2002 du site http://www.lsuc.on.ca/services/legalaidpiloten.jsp
• Paciocco, D.M. et Stuesser, L., The Law of Evidence, 2^nded. Toronto: Irwin Law. 1999.
• Pernanen, K., Cousieau, M., Brochu, S. et Sun, F. . Proportions des crimes associés à l'alcool et aux autres drogues au Canada. Centre canadien de lutte contre l'alcoolisme et les toxicomanies. 2002. Extrait le 2 août 2002 du site http://www.ccsa.ca/
• Petrowski, T.D.,   Miranda revisited. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 70,25-33. 2001.
• Philips, R., Big 6: Lawful Exceptions to Miranda. Law Enforcement Quarterly, 30, 16-19. 2001.
• Phillips, C. et Brown, D., Entry into the criminal justice system: A survey of police arrests and outcomes. London: Home Office. 1998.
• Pitts, D., The Scottsboro boys and fundamental rights. Issues of Democracy, IIP Electronic Journals, 6, 29-35. 2001.
• Porporino, F., L'incarcération des délinquants ayant des problèmes de santé mentale. Service correctionnel du Canada. 1994. Extrait le 20 août 2002 du site www.csc-cc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r33/r33e_f.shtml
• Raine, J.W. et Wilson, M.J., The court, consumerism and the defendant. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 498-508. 1996.
• Renke, W.N., By-passing the tell-tale heart: The right to counsel and the exclusion of evidence. University of British Columbia Law Review, 30, 99-136. 1996a.
• Renke, W.N., Flappers to rappers: Criminal Law in 1921 and 1996. Alberta Law Review,35, 80- 116. 1996b.
• Roesch, R., Mental health interventions in jails. In G. Davis, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McCurran et C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice(pp. 520-531). New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1995.
• Sanders, A., Access to justice in the police station: An elusive dream? In R. Young et D. Wall (Eds.), Access to criminal justice(pp. 254-275). London: Blackstone Press. 1996.
• Sharpe, R.J. et Swinton, K.E. . The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Toronto: Irwin Law. 1998.
• Stuart, D., Charter justice in Canadian criminal law (3^rded.). Toronto: Carswell. 2001.
• Stuckey, G.B., Roberson, C. et Wallace, H., Procedures in the justice system (6^thed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 2001.
• Teplin, L., The prevalence of severe mental disorders among male jail detainees: comparison with the Epidemiological Catchment Area Program. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 663-669. 1990.
• Teplin, L., Keeping the peace: Police discretion and mentally ill persons. National Institute of Justice Journal, p. 1-15. 2000.
• Thomas, G. et Leo, R.A., The effects of Miranda v. Arizona: Embedded in our national culture? In M. Tonry, (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A review of research, crime and justice, vol. 29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2001.
• Uelmen, G.F., 2001: A train ride: A guided tour of the sixth amendment right to counsel», Law and Contemporary Problems, 58, 13-2. 1995.
• Verdun-Jones, S.N. et Tijerino, A.A.   An assessment of the B.C. Law Courts Education Society Pilot Project for Unrepresented Defendants: A legal and qualitative analysis. Ottawa; ministère de la   Justice du Canada. 2001.
• Vernon, M., Steinberg, A.G. et Montoya, L.A. Deaf murderers: Clinical and forensic issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 495-516. 1999.
• Vitelli, R., The homeless inmate in a maximum-security prison. Revue canadienne de criminologie, Vol. 35, pp. 323-331. 1993.
• Wall, D.S., Legal aid, social policy, and the architecture of criminal justice: The supplier induced inflation thesis and legal aid policy. Journal of Law and Society, 23, 549-569. 1996.
• Wilkinson, J.S., The possibility of alcoholic automatism: Some empirical evidence. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 2, 217-238. 1997.
• Zapf, P., Roesch, R. et Hart, S., An examination of the relationship of homelessness to mental disorder, criminal behaviour, and health care in pretrial jail population. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, Vol. 41, pp. 435-440. 1996.

JURISPRUDENCES CITÉES

COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA

• R. c.Bartle (1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 289.
• R. c. Brydges (1990), 53 C.C.C. (3d) 330.
• R. c. Cobham (1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 333.
• R. c. Collins(1987), 33 C.C.C. (3d) 1.
• R. c. Debot(1989), 52 C.C.C. (3d) 207.
• R. c. Evans(1991), 63 C.C.C. (3d) 289.
• R. c. Feeney (1997), 115 C.C.C. (3d) 129.
• R. c. Harper(1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 423.
• R. c. Latimer(1997), 112 C.C.C. (3d) 193.
• R. c.Matheson(1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 434.
• R. c. Pozniak (1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 472.
• R. c. Prosper(1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 353.
• R. c. Whittle(1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 11.
• R. c.Therens (1985), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 481.

COURS D'APPEL PROVINCIALES ET TERRITORIALES

• R. c. Boomer (2001), 154 C.C.C. (3d) 425 (C.A. C.-B.).
• R. c. Brunczlik, [2000] O.J. No. 116 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• R. c. Chisholm, [2001] N.S.J. No. 58 (C.A. N.-É.), en direct: QL (N.S.J.).
• R. c. Dimic, [1998] O.J. No. 2666 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• R. c. Eakin, [2000] O.J. No. 1670 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• R.c. Davis, [1999] O.J. No. 141 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• R.c. Ferguson, [1997] B.C.J. No. 342 (C.A. C.-B.), en direct: QL (B.C.J.).
• R. c.. Fowler, [1996] N.J. No. 318 (C.A. T.-N.), en direct: QL (N.J.).
• Rc. Genaille(1997), 116 C.C.C. (3d) 459 (C.A. Man.).
• R. c. Girard, [1993] N.S.J. No. 67 (C.A. N.-É.), en direct: QL (N.S.J.).
• R. c. Gormley(1999), 140 C.C.C. (3d) 110 (C.A. Î.-P.-É.).
• R.c. Jones, [1993] A.J. No. 212 (C.A. Alb.), en direct: QL (A.J.).
• Rc. Jones, [1999] O.J. No. 577 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• Rc. Jutras( 2001), 160 C.C.C. (3d) 113 (C.A. Sask.).
• R. c.Kennedy(1995), 103 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (C.A. T.-N.).
• RcLeedahl, [2002] S.J. No. 14 (C.A. Sask.), en direct: QL (S.J.).
• Rc. Littleford,[2001] O.J. No. 2437 (C.A. Ont.), en direct: QL (O.J.).
• Rc. Luong(2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 571 (C.A. Alb.).
• R. cM.K.A., [1993] A.J. No. 153 (C.A. Alb.), en direct: QL (A.J.).
• R. c. McIntosh(1999), 141 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (C.A. Ont.).
• R. c. McKeen, [2001] N.S.J. No. 44 (C.A. N.-É.), en direct: QL (N.S.J.).
• R. c. Moore,[1995] A.J. No. 1059 (C.A. Alb.), en direct: QL (A.J.).
• R. c.Mosher, [1992] N.S.J. No. 512 (C.A. N.-É.), en direct: QL (N.S.J.).
• Rc. Nickerson (2001), 160 C.C.C. (3d) 300 (C.A. N.-É.).
• R. c. Noël(2001), 156 C.C.C. (3d) 17 (C.A. Qué.).
• R. c. Parrill,[1998] N.J. No. 322 (C.A. T.-N.), en direct: QL (N.J.).
• R. c.Polashek(1999), 134 C.C.C. (3d) 187 (C.A. Ont.).
• R. c. Poudrier, [1998] B.C.J. No. 784 (C.A. C.-B.), en direct: QL (B.C.J.).
• Rc. Russell, [1996] S.J. No. 59, en direct: QL (S.J.).
• R. c. Small(1998), 123 C.C.C. (3d) 560 (C.A. Alb.).
• R. c. Smith(1999), 134 C.C.C. (3d) 453 (C.A. Ont.).
• R. c.Taylor(1991). 77 C.C.C. (3d) 551 (C.A. Ont.).
• R. c.. Wallace (2002), 165 C.C.C. (3d) 84 (C.A. N.-É.).
•  R. c. Whitford(1997), 115 C.C.C. (3d) 52 (C.A. Alb.).
• R. c. Wydenes, [1999] B.C. J. No. 794 (C.A. C.-B.), en direct: QL (B.C.J.).

ARRÊTS AMÉRICAINS

• Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).
• Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000).
• Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
• United States v. Sterling, 283 F. 3d 216 (4^thCir. 2002).

ARRÊTS ANGLAIS

• R. v. Glaves, [1993] Crim. L.R. 685 (C.A.).
• R. v. Miller(1990) Crim L.R. 572

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante