Le rôle de la victime au sein du processus judiciaire : une analyse bibliographique 1989 à 1999
3. Droits des victimes au Canada (suite)
3. Droits des victimes au Canada (suite)
Matériel bibliographique
(1) Documentation universitaire
Pré-1990
- Bailey, S. « Pennies from Heaven: The Ontario Criminal Injuries Compensation Board », Journal of Law and Social Policy, nº 5, 1989, p. 112.
- Barfknecht, D. « Concerns of Canada's Victims Rights Movement », Can. Community L.J., nº 8, 1985, p. 83.
- Bonta, J., L. Motiuk et P. Sonnichsen. « Restitution in Correctional Halfway Houses: Victim Satisfaction, Attitudes, and Recidivism », Can. J. Crim., nº 25, 1983, p. 277.
- Carter, R. « Only the Good Deserve Compensation: A Comment on R. ex rel. Foy v. Crimes Compensation Board of Saskatchewan », Sask. L. Rev., nº 51, 1987, p. 163.
- Clarke, P. « Is there a Place for the Victim in the Prosecution Process? », Can. Criminology Forum, nº 8, 1986, p. 31.
- Dittenhoffer, T. et R. Ericson. « The Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program: A Message to Correctional Reformers », U. T. L. J., nº 33, 1983, p. 315.
- Drennan-Searson, P., I. Waller et R. Weiler. The Victims' Movement in Canada and Abroad. Its Implication for Psychiatrists. [York University Library, HV 6250. 3 C3 D73, 1987.]
- Faieta, M. « The Ontario Criminal Injuries Compensation Board: Application by Victims of Spousal Assault », Advocates' Soc. J., nº 2, 1989, p. 9.
- Gunn, R. et C. Minch. « Sexual Assault: The Dilemma of Disclosure and the Question of Conviction », an. J. Law and Society, nº 4, 1989, p. 202.
- Riedel, K. The Victim's Guide to the Canadian Justice System. Scarborough: Centennial College Press, 1989. Rubel, H. « Victim Participation in Sentencing Proceedings », Crim. L. Q., nº 28, 1986, p. 226.
- Stark, J. The Rights of Crime Victims. Toronto: Bantam Books, 1985.
- Trudelle, J. Crime Victims Compensation in Quebec. Montreal: Legal Information Research Group, McGill University, 1984. Viens, C. Le projet de loi, C-89: « Justice pour les victimes d'actes criminels », Droit criminel, 1989, p. 133.
1990
- Laflamme-Cusson, S. « The Declaration of the Victim in Court: Evaluation of an Experiment in Montreal Law Courts », Criminologie, nº 23, 1990, p. 73.
- Libman, R. « Legislative Update - Bill C-89: Victim Fine Surcharges », J.M.V.L., nº 2, 1990, p. 121.
- McGilliwray, A. « Abused Children in the Courts: Adjusting the Scales after Bill C-15 », Manitoba L. J., nº 19, 1990, p. 549.
- Van Ginkel, D. « Finally Compensating the Victim », Can. J. Fam. L., nº 8, 1990, p. 388.
- Waller, I. « Victims, Safer Communities and Sentencing », Can. J. Criminology, 1990, p. 461.
1991
- Acorn, A. « R. v. Seaboyer: Pornographic Imagination and the Springs of Relevance », ConSt. Forum, nº 3, 1991, p. 25.
- Boyle et MaCrimmon. « R. v. Seaboyer: A Lost Cause », 7 C.R. (4e), 1991, p. 225.
- Giliberti C. Evaluation of Victim Impact Statement Projects in Canada: A Summary of the Findings, Kaiser G., H. Kury et Albrecht, éd. Victims and Criminal Justice, Freiburg: Max-Planck Institute, 1991.
- Langer, R. « Battered Women and the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board », Sask. L. Rev., nº 55, 1991, p. 453.
- Weitekamp, E. Recent Developments on Restitution and Victim-Offender Reconciliation in the USA and Canada: An Assessment, Kaiser G., H. Kury et Albrecht, éd. Victims and Criminal Justice, Freiburg: Max-Planck Institute, 1991.
1992
- Allman, A. « A Reply to R. v. Seaboyer: A Lost Cause », 10 C.R. (4e), 1992, p. 153.
- Burns, P. Criminal Injuries Compensation, 2e éd. (Toronto: Butterworths, 1992).
- Castel, J. « The Use of Screens and Closed-circuit Television in the Prosecution of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Necessary Protection for Children or a Violation of the Rights of the Accused? », Can. J. Fam. L., nº 10, 1992, p. 283.
- Cogswell, C. « The Issue of Relevance in R. v. Seaboyer » Dal. J. Leg. Studies, nº 1, 1992, p. 97.
- Delisle, R. J. « Potential Charter Challenges to the New Rape Shield Law », 13 C.R. (4e), 1992, p. 390.
- Des Rosiers, N. « Limitation Periods and Civil Remedies for Childhood Sexual Abuse », Can. Fam. L.Q., nº 9, 1992, p. 43.
- Shaffer, M. « R. v. Seaboyer: A Case Comment », C. J. W. L., nº 5, 1992, p. 207.
1993
- Bala, N. « Criminal Code Amendments to Increase Protection to Children and Women: Bills C-126 and C-1 », C.R., nº 21, 1993, p. 465.
- Feldthusen, B. « The Civil Action for Sexual Battery: Therapeutic Jurisprudence? », Ottawa L. Rev., nº 25, 1993, p. 203.
- Hughes, P. « How Many Times a Victim? L. (A.) v. Saskatchewan (Crimes Compensation Board), and Pigeau v. Crowell, P. C. J. », C. J.W.L., nº 6, 1993, p. 502.
- Neeb, J. et S. Harper. Civil Action for Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Practical Guide. Toronto: Butterworths, 1993. Skurka, S. « Two Scales of Justice: The Victim as Adversary », Criminal Law Quarterly, nº 35, 1993, p. 334.
- Young, A. « Two Scales of Justice: A Reply », Criminal Law Quarterly, nº 35, 1993, p. 355.
1994
- Corbett, M. C. et A. Sonnen. « Disclosure of Complainants' Records in Sexual Assault Trials », Crim. L.Q., nº 37, 1994, p. 37.
- Coughlan, S. G. « Sexual Assault Complainants and Psychiatric Records: Keeping Exceptions to Confidentiality Truly Exceptional », Health L.J., nº 2, 1994, p. 135.
- Mosher, J. « Challenging Limitation Periods: Civil Claims by Adult Survivors of Incest », U.T.L.J., nº 44, 1994, p. 169.
- Schwartz, H. « Sex with the Accused on Other Occasions: The Evisceration of the Rape Shield Law », 31 C.R. (4e), 1994, p. 232.
- Sheehy, E. « Compensation for Women Who Have Been Raped », J. Roberts et R. Mohr, (éd.), Confronting Sexual Assault: A Decade of Legal and Social Change. Toronto: U of T Press, 1994.
- Wiegers, W. « Compensation for Wife Abuse: Empowering Victims? », U.B.C.L. Rev., nº 28, 1994, p. 247.
1995
- Neufeld, A. « A(L.L.) v. B. (A.): A Case Comment on the Production of Sexual Assault Counselling Records », Sask. L. Rev., nº 59, 1995, p. 335.
- Pilon, M. Victims' Rights Legislation and the Canadian Constitution. Ottawa : Bibliothèque du Parlement le 24 novembre, 1995a.
- Pilon, M. Victims' Rights and Services. Ottawa : Bibliothèque du Parlement le 15 août, 1995b.
- Valverde, M., L. MacLeod et K. Johnson (éd.), Wife Assault and the Canadian Justice System. Toronto: Centre for Criminology, 1995.
1996
- Alderson, D. « R. v. O'Connor and Bill C-46: Two Wrongs don't make a Right », Crim. L.Q., nº 39, 1996, p. 181.
- Bennett, E. « Disclosure of Complainants Medical and Therapeutic Records », Can. Crim. L. Rev., nº 1, 1996, p. 17.
- Cameron, J. « Tradition and Change under the Charter: The Adversary System, Third Party Interests and the Legitimacy of Criminal Justice in Canada », J. Cameron (éd.), The Charter's Impact on the Criminal Justice System. Scarborough: Carswell, 1996.
- Feldthusen, B. « Access to the Private Therapeutic Records of Sexual Assault Complainants », Can. Bar Rev., nº 75, 1996, p. 537.
- Holmes, H. « Access to Third Party Records: Does R. v. O'Connor make a Difference », 44 C.R. (4e),1996, p. 144.
- MacCrimmon, M. « Trial By Ordeal », Can. Crim. L. Rev., nº 1, 1996, p. 31.
- Mitchell, G. « Abuse of Process and the Crown's Disclosure Obligation », 44 C.R. (4e), 1996, p. 130.
- Peters, M. « Third Party Disclosure under O'Connor: Defence Concerns », 44 C.R. (4e), 1996, p. 1.
- Renaud, G. « The Reformed Code of Criminal Restitution: Some Observations », Advocate, nº 54, 1996, p. 725.
- Renaud, G. Rules Governing Restitution Orders. Ontario Appeal Cases, nº 87, 1996, p. 385.
- Struesser, L. « General Principles Concerning Disclosure », Can. Crim. L. Rev., nº 1, 1996, p. 1.
- Young, A. « When Titans Clash: The Limits of Constitutional Adjudication », 44 C.R. (4e), 1996, p. 152.
1997
- Busby, K. « Discriminatory uses of Personal Records in Sexual Violence Cases », C.J.W.L., nº 9, 1997, p. 148.
- Cooper, J. et G. Lewis. « Community Notification of High Risk Sex Offenders: The Manitoba Model », U.N.B.L.J., nº 46, 1997, p. 171.
- Doueck, H., E. Weston, L. Filbert, R. Beekhuis et H. Redlich. « A Child Witness Advocacy Program: Caretakers and Professionals' Views », J.Child Sexual Abuse, nº 6, 1997, p. 113.
- Epp, J. A. « Production of Confidential Records Held by a Third Party in Sexual Assault Cases: R. v. O'Connor », Ottawa L. Rev., nº 28, 1996 et 1997, p. 191.
- Gaudreault, A. « Restitution Measures: A Promising Aspect of the Recent Sentencing Reform », Justice Rep., nº 12, 1997, p. 9.
- Date de modification :