Le rôle de la victime au sein du processus judiciaire : une analyse bibliographique 1989 à 1999
4. Les droits des victimes dans le monde (suite)
4. Les droits des victimes dans le monde (suite)
Matériel bibliographique
Americain
Pré-1990
- Boudreaux, P. « Booth v. Maryland and the Individual Vengeance Rationale for Criminal Punishment », The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, nº 80, 1989, p.177.
- Calcutt, P. « The Victims' rights Act of 1988, The Florida Constitution and the New Struggle for Victims' Rights », Florida State U.L. Rev., nº 16, 1988, p. 811.
- Campbell, P. « Comparative Study of Victim Compensation Procedures in France and the United States: A Modest Proposal », Hastings Int'l and Comparative L. Rev., nº 3, 1980, p. 321.
- Davis, R., F. Kunreuther et E. Connick. « Expanding the Victim's Role in the Criminal Court Dispositional Process: The Results of an Experiment », The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, nº 75, 1984, p. 491.
- Eikenberry, K. « The Elevation of Victims' Rights in Washington State: Constitutional Status », Pepperdine L. Rev., nº 17, 1989, p. 19.
- Hellerstein, D. « The Victim Impact Statement: Reform or Reprisal? », Am. Crim. L. Rev., nº 27, 1989, p.391.
- Henderson, L. « The Wrongs of Victims' rights », Stanford L. Rev., nº 37, 1985, p. 937.
- Welling, S. « Victim Participation in Plea Bargains », Washington U. L. Q., nº 65, 1987, p. 301.
- Welling, S. Victims dans le procès criminel: « Utilitarian Analysis of Victim Participation in the Charging Decision », Arizona L. Rev., nº 30, 1988, p. 85.
1990
- Erez, E. et P. Tontodonato. « Effect of Victim Participation on Sentence Outcome », Criminology, nº 28, 1990, p.451.
- Roberts, A. Helping Crime Victims: Research, Policy, and Practice. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.
- Young, M. « Victim Assistance in the United States: The End of the Beginning », Int'l Rev. Victimology, nº 1, 1990, p. 181.
1991
- Hall, D. « Victims' Voices in Criminal Court: The Need for Restraint », Am. Crim. L.Rev., nº 28, 1991, p. 233.
- Dixon, T. « Arizona Criminal Procedure after the Victims' Bill of Rights Amendment: Implications of a Victim's Absolute Right to Refuse a Defendant's Discovery Request », Arizona State L.J., nº 23, 1991, p. 831.
1992
- Bendor, C. « Defendants' Wrongs and Victims' Rights (Commentaire de jurisprudence) Payne v. Tennessee 111 S. Ct. 2597 », Harv.Civil Rights-Civil Liberties L. Rev., nº 27, 1992, p. 219.
- Clarke, C. et T. Block. « Victims' Voices and Constitutional Quandaries: Life After Payne v. Tennessee », St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p.35.
- Ewing, C. « The Demise of Booth v. Maryland (Commentaire de jurisprudence) Payne v. Tennessee 111 S. Ct. 2597 », Pacific L.J., nº 23, 1992, p.1389.
- Fahey, P. « An Eye for an Eye and Then Some (Constitutionality of Victim Impact Testimony) Payne v. Tennessee », Connecticut L. Rev., nº 25, 1992, p. 205.
- Ford, M. et P. Nembach. « The Victim's Right to Privacy: Imperfect Protection from the Criminal Justice System » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 205.
- Franck, L. « The Collection of Restitution: An Often Overlooked Service to Crime Victims », St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 107.
- Gegan, S. et N. Rodriguez. « Victims' Roles in the Criminal Justice System: A Fallacy of Victim Empowerment? » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 225.
- Gerwurz, D. et M. Mercurio. « The Victims' Bill of Rights: Are Victims all Dressed up with no Place to Go? » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 251.
- Karmen, A. « Who's Against Victims' Rights? The Nature of the Opposition to Pro-Victim Initiatives in Criminal Justice » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 157.
- Lauri, A. et P. Schaubeck. « Like Father Like Son? The Constitutionality of New York's Son of Sam Law » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 279.
- Meske, M. « Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Crime Victims' Dilemma (commentaire de jurisprudence) Simon et Schuster v.
- Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board », Wash. L. Rev., nº 67, 1992, p. 1001.
- Nicholson, G. « Victims Rights, Remedies and Resources: A Maturing Presence in American Jurisprudence (California) » (colloque sur les droits des victimes), Pacific L.J., nº 23, 1992, p. 815.
- Smith, B. et C.R. Huff. « From Victim to Political Activist: An Empirical Examination of a State-wide Victims' Rights Movement », J. Crim. Just., nº 20, 1992, p. 201.
- Sperry, W. « Victim Impact Evidence with a Retributive System of Justice », Creighton L. Rev., nº 25, 1992, p. 1275.
- Starkweather, D. « The Retributive Theory of 'Just Deserts' and Victim Participation in Plea Bargaining », Indiana L.J., nº 67, 1992, p. 853.
- Tschorn, A. « Beyond Son of Sam: A Constitutionally Valid Alternative to New York Executive Law Section 632-a. (commentaire de jurisprudence) Simon and Schuster Inc. v. New York State Crime Victims Board 112 S. Ct. 501 » (1992) 17 Vermont L. Rev., nº 17, 1992, p. 321.
- Uelmen, G. « Victims' Rights in California » (Victims' Rights Symposium), St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, nº 8, 1992, p. 197.
1993
- Cornille, S. « Retribution's 'Harm Component' and the Victim Impact Statement: Finding a Workable Model », U. of Dayton L.R., 1993, p. 389.
- Erlemeier, M. « The First Amendment Prevails Over Crime Victim Compensation (commentaire de jurisprudence) Simon et Schuster Inc. v. New York State Crime Victims Board », Creighton L. Rev., nº 26, 1993, p. 1301.
- Loverdi, R. « Victim Impact Evidence - Eighth Amendment Does Not Erect a per se Bar to the Introduction of Victim Impact Evidence at a Capital Sentencing Hearing (Payne v. Tennessee) », Rutgers L. J., nº 24, 1993, p. 543.
- McCoy, C. Politics and Plea Bargaining: Victims' Rights in California. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993. McLeod, E. « Re-examining the Admissibility of Victim Impact Evidence », Mercer L.Rev., nº 44, 1993, p.1461. Umbreit, M. et R. Coates. « Cross-Site Analysis of Victim-offender Mediation in Four States », Crime and Delinquency, nº 39, 1993, p. 565.
- Wegryn, R. « New Jersey Constitutional Amendment for Victims' Rights: Symbolic Victory? », Rutgers L.J., nº 25, 1993, p.183.
1994
- Bernat, F., W. Parsonage et J. Helfgott. « Victim Impact Laws and the Parole Process in the United States », Int'l Rev. Victimology, nº 3, 1994, p.121.
- Brown, J. « Politics and Plea Bargaining: Victims' Rights in California », Hastings L.J., nº 45, 1994, p. 697.
- Cassell, P. « Balancing the Scales of Justice: The Case for and the Effects of Utah's Victims' Rights Amendment », Utah L. Rev., 1994, p. 1373.
- Davis, R. C. et B. Smith, « The Effects of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing Decisions: A Test in an Urban Setting », Justice Quarterly, nº 11, 1994, p. 453.
- Davis, R. et B. Smith. « Victim Impact Statements and Victim Satisfaction; An Unfulfilled Promise? », J. Crim. Justice, nº 22, 1994, p. 1.
- Ginsburg, W. Victims' Rights: A Complete Guide to Crime Victim Compensation. Clearwater: Sphinx, 1994.
- Greer, D. « Transatlantic Perspective on the Compensation of Crime Victims in the United States », Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, nº 85, 1994, p. 333.
- Henley, M., R. Davis et B. Smith. « The Reactions of Prosecutors and judges to Victim Impact Statements », Int'l Rev. Victomology, nº 3, 1994, p. 63.
- Kersh, M. « The Empowerment of the Crime Victim: A Comparative Study of Victim Compensation Schemes in the United States and Australia », Calif. W. Int'l L.J., nº 24, 1994, p. 345.
- Palmer, J. Everything You Need to Know When You are a Victim of Violent Crime. New York: Rosen Publishing, 1994.
- Scott, S. « Beyond the Victims' Bill of Rights: The Shield Becomes a Sword », Arizona L. Rev., nº 36, 1994, p. 249.
- Sebba, L. « Sentencing and the Victim: The Aftermath of Payne », Int'l Rev.Victimology, nº 3, 1994, p. 141.
- Umbreit, M. « Crime Victims Confront their Offenders: The Impact of a Minneapolis Mediation Program », Research on Social Work Practice, nº 4, 1994, p. 436.
- Vital, V. « The Use of Victim Impact Evidence at Capital Sentencing Trials », Thurgood Marshall L. Rev., nº 19, 1994, p. 497.
1995
- Fletcher, G. With Justice for Some: Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials. Lecture: Addison-Wellesley, 1995.
- Luginbuhl, J. et M. Burkhead. « Victim Impact Evidence in a Capital Trial: Encouraging Votes for Death », Am. J. Criminal Justice, nº 20, 1995, p. 1.
- Mosteller, R. « With Justice for Some: Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials », Harv. L. Rev., nº 109, 1995, p. 487.
- Mulholland, C. « Sentencing Criminals: The Constitutionality of Victim Impact Statements », Missouri L.R., nº 60, 1995, p. 731.
- Schulhofer, S. « With Justice for Some: Victims' Rights in Criminal Trials », Yale L. J., nº 105, 1995, p. 825.
- Weed, F. Certainty of Justice: Reform in the Crime Movement. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995.
1996
- Dugger, A. « Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing: A History of Incompatibility », Am. J. Crim. L., nº 23, 1996, p. 375.
- Galaway, B. et J. Hudson (éd.) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press, 1996.
- Niemeyer, M. et D. Shichor. « Preliminary Study of a Large Victim/offender Reconciliation Program (Orange County, California) », Federal Probation, nº 60, 1996, p. 30.
- Pizzi, W. et W. Perron. « Crime Victims in German Courtrooms: A Comparative Perspective on American Problems », Stanf. J. Int'l L., nº 32, 1996, p. 37.
- Spears, J. et C. Spohn. « The Genuine Victim and Prosecutors' Charging Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases », Am. J. Crim. Justice, nº 20, 1996, p. 183.
- Subar, I. « Emphasizing Victims' Rights at the Sentencing Phase of Criminal Proceedings », Maryland L. Rev., nº 55, 1996, p. 72.
- Date de modification :